Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Statistics > Applications

arXiv:2110.02135 (stat)
[Submitted on 5 Oct 2021]

Title:The Quality of the 2020 Census: An Independent Assessment of Census Bureau Activities Critical to Data Quality

Authors:Paul Biemer, Joseph Salvo, Jonathan Auerbach
View PDF
Abstract:This report summarizes major findings from an independent evaluation of 2020 census operations. The American Statistical Association 2020 Census Quality Indicators Task Force selected the authors to conduct the evaluation using nonpublic operations data provided by the Census Bureau.
The evaluation focused on the quality of state-level population counts released by the Census Bureau for congressional apportionment. The authors first partitioned the census enumeration process into five operation phases. Within each phase, one or more activities considered to be critical to census data quality were identified. Operational data from each activity were then analyzed to assess the risk of error, particularly as they related to similar activities in the 2010 census.
Overall, the evaluation found that census operations relied on higher risk activities at a higher rate in 2020 than in 2010, suggesting that the risk of error may be higher in 2020 than in 2010. However, the available data were insufficient to determine whether the apportionment counts are of lower quality in 2020 than in 2010.
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP)
Cite as: arXiv:2110.02135 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:2110.02135v1 [stat.AP] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.02135

Submission history

From: Jonathan Auerbach [view email]
[v1] Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:11:06 UTC (11,257 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
stat.AP
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-10
Change to browse by:
stat

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)