close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cond-mat > arXiv:2109.03634

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Condensed Matter > Materials Science

arXiv:2109.03634 (cond-mat)
[Submitted on 8 Sep 2021]

Title:Assessment of the Accuracy of Density Functionals for Calculating Oxygen Reduction Reaction on Nitrogen Doped Graphene

Authors:Björn Kirchhoff, Aleksei Ivanov, Egill Skúlason, Timo Jacob, Donato Fantauzzi, Hannes Jónsson
View a PDF of the paper titled Assessment of the Accuracy of Density Functionals for Calculating Oxygen Reduction Reaction on Nitrogen Doped Graphene, by Bj\"orn Kirchhoff and 5 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Experimental studies of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) at nitrogen doped graphene electrodes have reported a remarkably low overpotential, on the order of 0.5 V, similar to Pt based electrodes. Theoretical calculations using density functional theory have lent support for this claim. However, other measurements have indicated that transition metal impurities are actually responsible for the ORR activity, thereby raising questions about the reliability of both the experiments and the calculations. In order to assess the accuracy of the theoretical calculations, various generalized gradient approximation (GGA), meta-GGA and hybrid functionals are employed here and calibrated against high-level wave function based coupled cluster calculations (CCSD(T)) of the overpotential as well as self-interaction corrected density functional calculations and published quantum Monte Carlo calculations of O adatom binding to graphene. The PBE0 and HSE06 hybrid functionals are found to give more accurate results than the GGA and meta-GGA functionals, as would be expected, and for low dopant concentration, 3.1%, the overpotential is calculated to be 1.0 V. The GGA and meta-GGA functionals give a lower estimate by as much as 0.4 V. When the dopant concentration is doubled, the overpotential calculated with hybrid functionals drops, while it increases in GGA functional calculations. The opposite trends result from different potential determining steps, the *OOH species being of central importance in the hybrid functional calculations while the reduction of *O determines the overpotential obtained in GGA and meta-GGA calculations. The results presented here are mainly based on calculations of periodic representations of the system, but a comparison is also made with molecular flake models which are found to give erratic results.
Comments: To be published in Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Subjects: Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci); Chemical Physics (physics.chem-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2109.03634 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]
  (or arXiv:2109.03634v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.03634
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2021, 17, 10, 6405-6415
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00377
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Björn Kirchhoff [view email]
[v1] Wed, 8 Sep 2021 13:24:53 UTC (3,940 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Assessment of the Accuracy of Density Functionals for Calculating Oxygen Reduction Reaction on Nitrogen Doped Graphene, by Bj\"orn Kirchhoff and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cond-mat.mtrl-sci
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-09
Change to browse by:
cond-mat
physics
physics.chem-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack