Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > quant-ph > arXiv:2109.01051

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Quantum Physics

arXiv:2109.01051 (quant-ph)
[Submitted on 2 Sep 2021 (v1), last revised 8 Mar 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:Can Error Mitigation Improve Trainability of Noisy Variational Quantum Algorithms?

Authors:Samson Wang, Piotr Czarnik, Andrew Arrasmith, M. Cerezo, Lukasz Cincio, Patrick J. Coles
View a PDF of the paper titled Can Error Mitigation Improve Trainability of Noisy Variational Quantum Algorithms?, by Samson Wang and 5 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs) are often viewed as the best hope for near-term quantum advantage. However, recent studies have shown that noise can severely limit the trainability of VQAs, e.g., by exponentially flattening the cost landscape and suppressing the magnitudes of cost gradients. Error Mitigation (EM) shows promise in reducing the impact of noise on near-term devices. Thus, it is natural to ask whether EM can improve the trainability of VQAs. In this work, we first show that, for a broad class of EM strategies, exponential cost concentration cannot be resolved without committing exponential resources elsewhere. This class of strategies includes as special cases Zero Noise Extrapolation, Virtual Distillation, Probabilistic Error Cancellation, and Clifford Data Regression. Second, we perform analytical and numerical analysis of these EM protocols, and we find that some of them (e.g., Virtual Distillation) can make it harder to resolve cost function values compared to running no EM at all. As a positive result, we do find numerical evidence that Clifford Data Regression (CDR) can aid the training process in certain settings where cost concentration is not too severe. Our results show that care should be taken in applying EM protocols as they can either worsen or not improve trainability. On the other hand, our positive results for CDR highlight the possibility of engineering error mitigation methods to improve trainability.
Comments: 24+29 pages, 6+4 figures
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Report number: LA-UR-21-28574
Cite as: arXiv:2109.01051 [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:2109.01051v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.01051
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Quantum 8, 1287 (2024)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-03-14-1287
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Samson Wang [view email]
[v1] Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:07:02 UTC (1,532 KB)
[v2] Fri, 8 Mar 2024 03:47:22 UTC (1,984 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Can Error Mitigation Improve Trainability of Noisy Variational Quantum Algorithms?, by Samson Wang and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-09
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack