Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2108.13589

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Medical Physics

arXiv:2108.13589 (physics)
[Submitted on 31 Aug 2021]

Title:Simulated dose painting of hypoxic sub-volumes in pancreatic cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy

Authors:Ahmed M. Elamir, Teodor Stanescu, Andrea Shessel, Tony Tadic, Ivan Yeung, Daniel Letourneau, John Kim, Jelena Lukovic, Laura A. Dawson, Rebecca Wong, Aisling Barry, James Brierley, Steven Gallinger, Jennifer Knox, Grainne O'Kane, Neesha Dhani, Ali Hosni, Edward Taylor
View a PDF of the paper titled Simulated dose painting of hypoxic sub-volumes in pancreatic cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy, by Ahmed M. Elamir and 17 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Dose painting of hypoxic tumour sub-volumes using positron-emission tomography (PET) has been shown to improve tumour control in silico in several sites. Pancreatic cancer presents a more stringent challenge, given its proximity to critical organs-at-risk (OARs) and anatomic motion. A radiobiological model was developed to estimate clonogen survival fraction (SF), using 18F-fluoroazomycin arabinoside PET (FAZA PET) images from ten patients with pancreatic cancer to quantify oxygen enhancement effects. For each patient, four simulated five-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plans were generated: 1) a standard SBRT plan aiming to cover the planning target volume with 40 Gy, 2) dose painting plans delivering escalated doses to FAZA-avid hypoxic sub-volumes, 3) dose painting plans with simulated spacer separating the duodenum and pancreatic head, and 4), plans with integrated boosts to geometric contractions of the tumour (GTV). All plans saturated at least one OAR dose limit. SF was calculated for each plan and sensitivity of SF to simulated hypoxia quantification errors was evaluated. Dose painting resulted in a 55% reduction in SF as compared to standard SBRT; 78% with spacer. Integrated boosts to hypoxia-blind geometric contractions resulted in a 41% reduction in SF. The reduction in SF for dose-painting plans persisted for all hypoxia quantification parameters studied, including registration and rigid motion errors that resulted in shifts and rotations of the GTV and hypoxic sub-volumes by as much as 1 cm and 10 degrees. Although proximity to OARs ultimately limited dose escalation, with estimated SFs (~10^-5) well above levels required to completely ablate a ~10 cm^3 tumour, dose painting robustly reduced clonogen survival when accounting for expected treatment and imaging uncertainties and thus, may improve local response and associated morbidity.
Subjects: Medical Physics (physics.med-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2108.13589 [physics.med-ph]
  (or arXiv:2108.13589v1 [physics.med-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.13589
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2021
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac215c
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Edward Taylor [view email]
[v1] Tue, 31 Aug 2021 02:29:37 UTC (4,179 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Simulated dose painting of hypoxic sub-volumes in pancreatic cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy, by Ahmed M. Elamir and 17 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
physics.med-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-08
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack