Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:2107.10017v2

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Methodology

arXiv:2107.10017v2 (stat)
[Submitted on 21 Jul 2021 (v1), revised 13 Jan 2022 (this version, v2), latest version 7 Feb 2023 (v4)]

Title:Multiple testing corrections for p-values and confidence intervals from generalised linear mixed models

Authors:Samuel I Watson, Joshua Akinyemi, Karla Hemming
View a PDF of the paper titled Multiple testing corrections for p-values and confidence intervals from generalised linear mixed models, by Samuel I Watson and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:In this article, we describe and propose methods to derive \textit{p}-values and sets of confidence intervals with strong control of the family-wise error rates and coverage for tests of parameters from multiple generalised linear mixed models. We examine in particular analysis of a cluster randomised trial with multiple outcomes. While the need for corrections for multiple testing is debated, the justification for doing so is that, without correction, the probability of rejecting at least one of a set of null hypotheses is greater than the nominal rate of any single test, and hence the coverage of a confidence set is lower than the nominal rate of any single interval. There are few methods \textit{p}-value corrections for GLMMs and no efficient methods for deriving confidence intervals, limiting their application in this setting. We adapt the Bonferroni and Holm methods, and the randomisation-test approach of Romano \& Wolf (2005) to a generalised linear model framework. A search procedure for confidence interval limits using randomisation tests is developed to produce a set of confidence intervals under each method of correction. We show that the Romano-Wolf type procedure has nominal error rates and coverage under non-independent correlation structures in a simulation-based study, but the other methods only have nominal rates when outcomes are independent. We also compare results from the analysis of a real-world trial.
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:2107.10017 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2107.10017v2 [stat.ME] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.10017
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Samuel Watson [view email]
[v1] Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:27:15 UTC (92 KB)
[v2] Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:54:16 UTC (182 KB)
[v3] Tue, 2 Aug 2022 09:28:57 UTC (453 KB)
[v4] Tue, 7 Feb 2023 10:50:53 UTC (514 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Multiple testing corrections for p-values and confidence intervals from generalised linear mixed models, by Samuel I Watson and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
stat.ME
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-07
Change to browse by:
stat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack