Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2106.03428

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2106.03428 (cs)
[Submitted on 7 Jun 2021]

Title:Automation for Interpretable Machine Learning Through a Comparison of Loss Functions to Regularisers

Authors:A. I. Parkes, J. Camilleri, D. A. Hudson, A. J. Sobey
View a PDF of the paper titled Automation for Interpretable Machine Learning Through a Comparison of Loss Functions to Regularisers, by A. I. Parkes and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:To increase the ubiquity of machine learning it needs to be automated. Automation is cost-effective as it allows experts to spend less time tuning the approach, which leads to shorter development times. However, while this automation produces highly accurate architectures, they can be uninterpretable, acting as `black-boxes' which produce low conventional errors but fail to model the underlying input-output relationships -- the ground truth. This paper explores the use of the Fit to Median Error measure in machine learning regression automation, using evolutionary computation in order to improve the approximation of the ground truth. When used alongside conventional error measures it improves interpretability by regularising learnt input-output relationships to the conditional median. It is compared to traditional regularisers to illustrate that the use of the Fit to Median Error produces regression neural networks which model more consistent input-output relationships. The problem considered is ship power prediction using a fuel-saving air lubrication system, which is highly stochastic in nature. The networks optimised for their Fit to Median Error are shown to approximate the ground truth more consistently, without sacrificing conventional Minkowski-r error values.
Comments: 11 pages, 5 figures, under review,
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2106.03428 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2106.03428v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.03428
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Amy Parkes Miss [view email]
[v1] Mon, 7 Jun 2021 08:50:56 UTC (823 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Automation for Interpretable Machine Learning Through a Comparison of Loss Functions to Regularisers, by A. I. Parkes and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-06
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack