Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2105.05128

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

arXiv:2105.05128 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 11 May 2021]

Title:Processing GOTO data with the Rubin Observatory LSST Science Pipelines II: Forced Photometry and light curves

Authors:L. Makrygianni, J. Mullaney, V. Dhillon, S. Littlefair, K. Ackley, M.J. Dyer, J. Lyman, K. Ulaczyk, R. Cutter, Y.-L. Mong, D. Steeghs, D. K. Galloway, P. O'Brien, G. Ramsay, S. Poshyachinda, R. Kotak, L. Nuttall, E. Pallé, D. Pollacco, E. Thrane, S. Aukkaravittayapun, S. Awiphan, R. Breton, U. Burhanudin, P. Chote, A. Chrimes, E. Daw, C. Duffy, R. Eyles-Ferris, B. Gompertz, T. Heikkilä, P. Irawati, M. Kennedy, T. Killestein, A. Levan, T. Marsh, D. Mata-Sanchez, S. Mattila, J. Maund, J. McCormac, D. Mkrtichian, E. Rol, U. Sawangwit, E. Stanway, R. Starling, P. A. Strøm, S. Tooke, K. Wiersema
View a PDF of the paper titled Processing GOTO data with the Rubin Observatory LSST Science Pipelines II: Forced Photometry and light curves, by L. Makrygianni and 47 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We have adapted the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Science Pipelines to process data from the Gravitational-Wave Optical Transient Observer (GOTO) prototype. In this paper, we describe how we used the Rubin Observatory LSST Science Pipelines to conduct forced photometry measurements on nightly GOTO data. By comparing the photometry measurements of sources taken on multiple nights, we find that the precision of our photometry is typically better than 20~mmag for sources brighter than 16 mag. We also compare our photometry measurements against colour-corrected PanSTARRS photometry, and find that the two agree to within 10~mmag (1$\sigma$) for bright (i.e., $\sim14^{\rm th}$~mag) sources to 200~mmag for faint (i.e., $\sim18^{\rm th}$~mag) sources. Additionally, we compare our results to those obtained by GOTO's own in-house pipeline, {\sc gotophoto}, and obtain similar results. Based on repeatability measurements, we measure a $5\sigma$ L-band survey depth of between 19 and 20 magnitudes, depending on observing conditions. We assess, using repeated observations of non-varying standard SDSS stars, the accuracy of our uncertainties, which we find are typically overestimated by roughly a factor of two for bright sources (i.e., $<15^{\rm th}$~mag), but slightly underestimated (by roughly a factor of 1.25) for fainter sources ($>17^{\rm th}$~mag). Finally, we present lightcurves for a selection of variable sources, and compare them to those obtained with the Zwicky Transient Factory and GAIA. Despite the Rubin Observatory LSST Science Pipelines still undergoing active development, our results show that they are already delivering robust forced photometry measurements from GOTO data.
Comments: Accepted for publication in PASA
Subjects: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM)
Cite as: arXiv:2105.05128 [astro-ph.IM]
  (or arXiv:2105.05128v1 [astro-ph.IM] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.05128
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2021.19
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Lydia Makrygianni [view email]
[v1] Tue, 11 May 2021 15:38:01 UTC (10,947 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Processing GOTO data with the Rubin Observatory LSST Science Pipelines II: Forced Photometry and light curves, by L. Makrygianni and 47 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.IM
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-05
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack