Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > math > arXiv:2103.15788

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Mathematics > Optimization and Control

arXiv:2103.15788 (math)
[Submitted on 29 Mar 2021]

Title:A branch-and-cut algorithm for submodular interdiction games

Authors:Kübra Tanınmış, Markus Sinnl
View a PDF of the paper titled A branch-and-cut algorithm for submodular interdiction games, by K\"ubra Tan{\i}nm{\i}\c{s} and Markus Sinnl
View PDF
Abstract:Many relevant applications from diverse areas such as marketing, wildlife conservation, or defending critical infrastructure can be modeled as interdiction games. In this work, we introduce interdiction games whose objective is a monotone and submodular set function. Given a ground set of items, the leader interdicts the usage of some of the items of the follower in order to minimize the objective value achievable by the follower, who seeks to maximize a submodular set function over the uninterdicted items subject to knapsack constraints.
We propose an exact branch-and-cut algorithm for these kind of interdiction games. The algorithm is based on interdiction cuts which allow to capture the follower's objective function value for a given interdiction decision of the leader and exploit the submodularity of the objective function. We also present extensions and liftings of these cuts and discuss additional preprocessing procedures.
We test our solution framework on the weighted maximal covering interdiction game and the bipartite inference interdiction game. For both applications, the improved variants of our interdiction cut perform significantly better than its basic version. For the weighted maximal covering interdiction game for which a mixed-integer bilevel linear programming (MIBLP) formulation is available, we compare the results with those of a state-of-the-art MIBLP solver. While the MIBLP solver yields a minimum of 54% optimality gap within one hour, our best branch-and-cut setting solves all but 4 of 108 instances to optimality with a maximum of 3% gap among unsolved ones.
Comments: 38 pages, 6 figures, 8 tables
Subjects: Optimization and Control (math.OC)
Cite as: arXiv:2103.15788 [math.OC]
  (or arXiv:2103.15788v1 [math.OC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.15788
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2022.1196
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Kübra Tanınmış [view email]
[v1] Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:31:37 UTC (190 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A branch-and-cut algorithm for submodular interdiction games, by K\"ubra Tan{\i}nm{\i}\c{s} and Markus Sinnl
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
math.OC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-03
Change to browse by:
math

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack