Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > q-bio > arXiv:2103.07061

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Quantitative Biology > Populations and Evolution

arXiv:2103.07061 (q-bio)
COVID-19 e-print

Important: e-prints posted on arXiv are not peer-reviewed by arXiv; they should not be relied upon without context to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information without consulting multiple experts in the field.

[Submitted on 12 Mar 2021 (v1), last revised 6 Aug 2021 (this version, v5)]

Title:How will mass-vaccination change COVID-19 lockdown requirements in Australia?

Authors:Cameron Zachreson, Sheryl L. Chang, Oliver M. Cliff, Mikhail Prokopenko
View a PDF of the paper titled How will mass-vaccination change COVID-19 lockdown requirements in Australia?, by Cameron Zachreson and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Background: To prevent future outbreaks of COVID-19, Australia is pursuing a mass-vaccination approach in which a targeted group of the population comprising healthcare workers, aged-care residents and other individuals at increased risk of exposure will receive a highly effective priority vaccine. The rest of the population will instead have access to a less effective vaccine.
Methods: We apply a large-scale agent-based model of COVID-19 in Australia to investigate the possible implications of this hybrid approach to mass-vaccination. The model is calibrated to recent epidemiological and demographic data available in Australia, and accounts for several components of vaccine efficacy.
Findings: Within a feasible range of vaccine efficacy values, our model supports the assertion that complete herd immunity due to vaccination is not likely in the Australian context. For realistic scenarios in which herd immunity is not achieved, we simulate the effects of mass-vaccination on epidemic growth rate, and investigate the requirements of lockdown measures applied to curb subsequent outbreaks. In our simulations, Australia's vaccination strategy can feasibly reduce required lockdown intensity and initial epidemic growth rate by 43% and 52%, respectively. The severity of epidemics, as measured by the peak number of daily new cases, decreases by up to two orders of magnitude under plausible mass-vaccination and lockdown strategies.
Interpretation: The study presents a strong argument for a large-scale vaccination campaign in Australia, which would substantially reduce both the intensity of future outbreaks and the stringency of non-pharmaceutical interventions required for their suppression.
Subjects: Populations and Evolution (q-bio.PE)
Cite as: arXiv:2103.07061 [q-bio.PE]
  (or arXiv:2103.07061v5 [q-bio.PE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.07061
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Cameron Zachreson [view email]
[v1] Fri, 12 Mar 2021 03:16:10 UTC (1,901 KB)
[v2] Fri, 19 Mar 2021 09:28:04 UTC (1,903 KB)
[v3] Thu, 1 Apr 2021 03:33:15 UTC (1,562 KB)
[v4] Sun, 18 Jul 2021 07:27:18 UTC (14,433 KB)
[v5] Fri, 6 Aug 2021 04:13:59 UTC (14,154 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled How will mass-vaccination change COVID-19 lockdown requirements in Australia?, by Cameron Zachreson and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
q-bio.PE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-03
Change to browse by:
q-bio

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack