close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2103.02078

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:2103.02078 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 2 Mar 2021 (v1), last revised 12 Jul 2021 (this version, v3)]

Title:Effects of overlapping sources on cosmic shear estimation: Statistical sensitivity and pixel-noise bias

Authors:Javier Sanchez, Ismael Mendoza, David P. Kirkby, Patricia R. Burchat (for the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration)
View a PDF of the paper titled Effects of overlapping sources on cosmic shear estimation: Statistical sensitivity and pixel-noise bias, by Javier Sanchez and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:In Stage-IV imaging surveys, a significant amount of the cosmologically useful information is due to sources whose images overlap with those of other sources on the sky. The cosmic shear signal is primarily encoded in the estimated shapes of observed galaxies and thus directly impacted by overlaps. We introduce a framework based on the Fisher formalism to analyze effects of overlapping sources (blending) on the estimation of cosmic shear. For the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), we present the expected loss in statistical sensitivity for the ten-year survey due to blending. We find that for approximately 62% of galaxies that are likely to be detected in full-depth LSST images, at least 1% of the flux in their pixels is from overlapping sources. We also find that the statistical correlations between measures of overlapping galaxies and, to a much lesser extent the higher shot noise level due to their presence, decrease the effective number density of galaxies, $N_{eff}$, by $\sim$18%. We calculate an upper limit on $N_{eff}$ of 39.4 galaxies per arcmin$^2$ in $r$ band. We study the impact of varying stellar density on $N_{eff}$ and illustrate the diminishing returns of extending the survey into lower Galactic latitudes. We extend the Fisher formalism to predict the increase in pixel-noise bias due to blending for maximum-likelihood (ML) shape estimators. We find that noise bias is sensitive to the particular shape estimator and measure of ensemble-average shape that is used, and properties of the galaxy that include redshift-dependent quantities such as size and luminosity.
Comments: Accepted for publication in JCAP. 45 pages, 19 figures
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM)
Report number: FERMILAB-PUB-21-048-E
Cite as: arXiv:2103.02078 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:2103.02078v3 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.02078
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/07/043
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Francisco Javier Sánchez López [view email]
[v1] Tue, 2 Mar 2021 23:05:41 UTC (3,273 KB)
[v2] Mon, 15 Mar 2021 15:32:06 UTC (3,276 KB)
[v3] Mon, 12 Jul 2021 19:57:36 UTC (12,666 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Effects of overlapping sources on cosmic shear estimation: Statistical sensitivity and pixel-noise bias, by Javier Sanchez and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-03
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.IM

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

1 blog link

(what is this?)
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack