Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > quant-ph > arXiv:2102.01738v1

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Quantum Physics

arXiv:2102.01738v1 (quant-ph)
[Submitted on 2 Feb 2021 (this version), latest version 9 Jun 2021 (v2)]

Title:Noise and the frontier of quantum supremacy

Authors:Adam Bouland, Bill Fefferman, Zeph Landau, Yunchao Liu
View a PDF of the paper titled Noise and the frontier of quantum supremacy, by Adam Bouland and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Understanding the power of quantum supremacy experiments is one of the most pressing topics in the NISQ era. In this work we make progress toward bridging the remaining gaps between theory and experiment, incorporating the effects of experimental noise into the theoretical hardness arguments.
First, we improve the robustness of prior hardness results in this area. For random circuit sampling, we show that computing the output probability of an $m$-gate random quantum circuit to within additive imprecision $2^{-O(m\log m)}$ is $\#\mathsf{P}$-hard, an exponential improvement over the prior hardness results of Bouland et al. and Movassagh which were resistant to imprecision $2^{-O(m^3)}$. This nearly reaches the threshold ($2^{-O(m)}$) sufficient to establish the hardness of sampling for constant-depth random circuits. For BosonSampling, we show $\#\mathsf{P}$-hardness of computing output probabilities of $n$-photon $m=\text{poly}(n)$ mode BosonSampling experiments to additive error $2^{-O(n\log n)}$. This is within a constant factor in the exponent of the robustness required for hardness of sampling. To prove these results we introduce a new robust Berlekamp-Welch argument over the Reals, and moreover substantially simplify prior robustness arguments.
Second, we show that in the random circuit sampling case, these results are still true in the presence of a constant rate of noise, so long as the noise rate is below the error detection threshold. That is, even though random circuits with a constant noise rate converge rapidly to the maximally mixed state, the small deviations in their output probabilities away from uniform remain difficult to compute. Interestingly, we then show that our results are in tension with one another, and the latter result implies the former is essentially optimal with respect to additive imprecision, even with generalizations of our techniques.
Comments: 43 pages, 2 figures, presented at QIP 2021
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Computational Complexity (cs.CC)
Cite as: arXiv:2102.01738 [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:2102.01738v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.01738
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Yunchao Liu [view email]
[v1] Tue, 2 Feb 2021 20:23:13 UTC (81 KB)
[v2] Wed, 9 Jun 2021 23:00:41 UTC (82 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Noise and the frontier of quantum supremacy, by Adam Bouland and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-02
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CC

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack