Mathematics > Number Theory
[Submitted on 25 Jan 2021 (v1), last revised 21 Nov 2021 (this version, v2)]
Title:Randomness of Mobius coefficents and brownian motion: growth of the Mertens function and the Riemann Hypothesis
View PDFAbstract:The validity of the Riemann Hypothesis (RH) on the location of the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann $\zeta$-function is directly related to the growth of the Mertens function $M(x) \,=\,\sum_{k=1}^x \mu(k)$, where $\mu(k)$ is the Möbius coefficient of the integer $k$: the RH is indeed true if the Mertens function goes asymptotically as $M(x) \sim x^{1/2 + \epsilon}$, where $\epsilon$ is an arbitrary strictly positive quantity. This behavior can be established on the basis of a new probabilistic approach based on the global properties of Mertens function. To this aim we derive a series of probabilistic results concerning the prime number distribution along the series of square-free numbers which shows that the Mertens function is subject to a normal distribution. We also show that the validity of the RH also implies the validity of the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis for the Dirichlet $L$-functions. Next we study the local properties of the Mertens function, i.e. its variation induced by each Möbius coefficient restricted to the square-free numbers. We perform a massive statistical analysis on these coefficients, applying to them a series of randomness tests of increasing precision and complexity, for a total number of eighteen different tests. The successful outputs of all these tests (each of them with a level of confidence of $99\%$ that all the sub-sequences analyzed are indeed random) can be seen as impressive "experimental" confirmations of the brownian nature of the restricted Möbius coefficients and the probabilistic normal law distribution of the Mertens function analytically established earlier. In view of the theoretical probabilistic argument and the large battery of statistical tests, we can conclude that while a violation of the RH is strictly speaking not impossible, it is however extremely improbable.
Submission history
From: Giuseppe Mussardo [view email][v1] Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:00:03 UTC (20,527 KB)
[v2] Sun, 21 Nov 2021 14:54:06 UTC (48,183 KB)
Current browse context:
math.NT
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.