Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > eess > arXiv:2101.08909

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Audio and Speech Processing

arXiv:2101.08909 (eess)
[Submitted on 22 Jan 2021 (v1), last revised 25 Jun 2021 (this version, v2)]

Title:Study of Pre-processing Defenses against Adversarial Attacks on State-of-the-art Speaker Recognition Systems

Authors:Sonal Joshi, Jesús Villalba, Piotr Żelasko, Laureano Moro-Velázquez, Najim Dehak
View a PDF of the paper titled Study of Pre-processing Defenses against Adversarial Attacks on State-of-the-art Speaker Recognition Systems, by Sonal Joshi and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Adversarial examples to speaker recognition (SR) systems are generated by adding a carefully crafted noise to the speech signal to make the system fail while being imperceptible to humans. Such attacks pose severe security risks, making it vital to deep-dive and understand how much the state-of-the-art SR systems are vulnerable to these attacks. Moreover, it is of greater importance to propose defenses that can protect the systems against these attacks. Addressing these concerns, this paper at first investigates how state-of-the-art x-vector based SR systems are affected by white-box adversarial attacks, i.e., when the adversary has full knowledge of the system. x-Vector based SR systems are evaluated against white-box adversarial attacks common in the literature like fast gradient sign method (FGSM), basic iterative method (BIM)--a.k.a. iterative-FGSM--, projected gradient descent (PGD), and Carlini-Wagner (CW) attack. To mitigate against these attacks, the paper proposes four pre-processing defenses. It evaluates them against powerful adaptive white-box adversarial attacks, i.e., when the adversary has full knowledge of the system, including the defense. The four pre-processing defenses--viz. randomized smoothing, DefenseGAN, variational autoencoder (VAE), and Parallel WaveGAN vocoder (PWG) are compared against the baseline defense of adversarial training. Conclusions indicate that SR systems were extremely vulnerable under BIM, PGD, and CW attacks. Among the proposed pre-processing defenses, PWG combined with randomized smoothing offers the most protection against the attacks, with accuracy averaging 93% compared to 52% in the undefended system and an absolute improvement >90% for BIM attacks with $L_\infty>0.001$ and CW attack.
Comments: This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication
Subjects: Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS); Sound (cs.SD)
Cite as: arXiv:2101.08909 [eess.AS]
  (or arXiv:2101.08909v2 [eess.AS] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.08909
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Sonal Joshi [view email]
[v1] Fri, 22 Jan 2021 01:25:18 UTC (1,014 KB)
[v2] Fri, 25 Jun 2021 15:37:47 UTC (1,860 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Study of Pre-processing Defenses against Adversarial Attacks on State-of-the-art Speaker Recognition Systems, by Sonal Joshi and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
eess.AS
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-01
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SD
eess

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack