Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2101.03190

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

arXiv:2101.03190 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 8 Jan 2021]

Title:The Stars Kepler Missed: Investigating the Kepler Target Selection Function Using Gaia DR2

Authors:Linnea M. Wolniewicz, Travis A. Berger, Daniel Huber
View a PDF of the paper titled The Stars Kepler Missed: Investigating the Kepler Target Selection Function Using Gaia DR2, by Linnea M. Wolniewicz and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:The Kepler Mission revolutionized exoplanet science and stellar astrophysics by obtaining highly precise photometry of over 200,000 stars over 4 years. A critical piece of information to exploit Kepler data is its selection function, since all targets had to be selected from a sample of half a million stars on the Kepler CCDs using limited information. Here we use Gaia DR2 to reconstruct the Kepler selection function and explore possible biases with respect to evolutionary state, stellar multiplicity, and kinematics. We find that the Kepler target selection is nearly complete for stars brighter than $Kp < 14$ mag and was effective at selecting main-sequence stars, with the fraction of observed stars decreasing from 95% to 60% between $14 < Kp < 16$ mag. We find that the observed fraction for subgiant stars is only 10% lower, confirming that a significant number of subgiants selected for observation were believed to be main-sequence stars. Conversely we find a strong selection bias against low-luminosity red giant stars ($R \approx 3-5 R_\odot$, $T_{eff} \approx 5500$K), dropping from 90% at $Kp = 14$ mag to below 30% at $Kp = 16$ mag, confirming that the target selection was efficient at distinguishing dwarfs from giants. We compare the Gaia Re-normalized Unit Weight Error (RUWE) values of the observed and non-observed main sequence stars and find a difference in elevated ($>$ 1.2) RUWE values at $\sim\,5\,\sigma$ significance, suggesting that the Kepler target selection shows some bias against either close or wide binaries. We furthermore use the Gaia proper motions to show that the Kepler selection function was unbiased with respect to kinematics.
Comments: 15 pages, 11 figures. Submitted to the AAS Astrophysical Journal. Presented at AAS 237
Subjects: Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR); Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP); Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)
Cite as: arXiv:2101.03190 [astro-ph.SR]
  (or arXiv:2101.03190v1 [astro-ph.SR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.03190
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/abee1d
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Linnea Wolniewicz M [view email]
[v1] Fri, 8 Jan 2021 19:20:42 UTC (2,297 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The Stars Kepler Missed: Investigating the Kepler Target Selection Function Using Gaia DR2, by Linnea M. Wolniewicz and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.SR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-01
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.EP
astro-ph.GA

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack