Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:2012.05648

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Applications

arXiv:2012.05648 (stat)
[Submitted on 10 Dec 2020]

Title:Towards a global dynamic wind atlas: A multi-country validation of wind power simulation from MERRA-2 and ERA-5 reanalyses bias-corrected with the Global Wind Atlas

Authors:Katharina Gruber, Peter Regner, Sebastian Wehrle, Marianne Zeyringer, Johannes Schmidt
View a PDF of the paper titled Towards a global dynamic wind atlas: A multi-country validation of wind power simulation from MERRA-2 and ERA-5 reanalyses bias-corrected with the Global Wind Atlas, by Katharina Gruber and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Reanalysis data are widely used for simulating renewable energy and in particular wind power generation. While MERRA-2 has been a de-facto standard in many studies, the newer ERA5- reanalysis recently gained importance. Here, we use these two datasets to simulate wind power generation and evaluate the respective quality in terms of correlations and errors when validated against historical wind power generation. However, due to their coarse spatial resolution, reanalyses fail to adequately represent local climatic conditions. We therefore additionally apply mean bias correction with two versions of the Global Wind Atlas (GWA) and assess the respective quality of resulting simulations. Potential users of the dataset can also benefit from our analysis of the impact of spatial and temporal aggregation on simulation quality indicators. While similar studies have been conducted, they mainly cover limited areas in Europe. In contrast, we look into regions, which globally differ significantly in terms of the prevailing climate: the US, Brazil, South-Africa, and New Zealand. Our principal findings are that (i) ERA5 outperforms MERRA-2, (ii) no major improvements can be expected by using bias-correction with GWA2, while GWA3 even reduces simulation quality, and (iii) temporal aggregation increases correlations and reduces errors, while spatial aggregation does so only consistently when comparing very low and very high aggregation levels.
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP)
Cite as: arXiv:2012.05648 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:2012.05648v1 [stat.AP] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.05648
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Katharina Gruber [view email]
[v1] Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:12:05 UTC (4,411 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Towards a global dynamic wind atlas: A multi-country validation of wind power simulation from MERRA-2 and ERA-5 reanalyses bias-corrected with the Global Wind Atlas, by Katharina Gruber and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
stat.AP
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-12
Change to browse by:
stat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack