Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > hep-ph > arXiv:2010.13709

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

arXiv:2010.13709 (hep-ph)
[Submitted on 26 Oct 2020 (v1), last revised 4 Jun 2021 (this version, v2)]

Title:Systematizing and addressing theory uncertainties of unitarization with the Inverse Amplitude Method

Authors:Alexandre Salas-Bernárdez, Felipe J. Llanes-Estrada, Juan Escudero-Pedrosa (Univ. Complutense Madrid), Jose Antonio Oller (Univ. Murcia)
View a PDF of the paper titled Systematizing and addressing theory uncertainties of unitarization with the Inverse Amplitude Method, by Alexandre Salas-Bern\'ardez and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Effective Field Theories (EFTs) constructed as derivative expansions in powers of momentum, in the spirit of Chiral Perturbation Theory (ChPT), are a controllable approximation to strong dynamics as long as the energy of the interacting particles remains small, as they do not respect exact elastic unitarity. This limits their predictive power towards new physics at a higher scale if small separations from the Standard Model are found at the LHC or elsewhere. Unitarized chiral perturbation theory techniques have been devised to extend the reach of the EFT to regimes where partial waves are saturating unitarity, but their uncertainties have hitherto not been addressed thoroughly. Here we take one of the best known of them, the Inverse Amplitude Method (IAM), and carefully following its derivation, we quantify the uncertainty introduced at each step. We compare its hadron ChPT and its electroweak sector Higgs EFT applications. We find that the relative theoretical uncertainty of the IAM at the mass of the first resonance encountered in a partial-wave is of the same order in the counting as the starting uncertainty of the EFT at near-threshold energies, so that its unitarized extension should \textit{a priori} be expected to be reasonably successful. This is so provided a check for zeroes of the partial wave amplitude is carried out and, if they appear near the resonance region, we show how to modify adequately the IAM to take them into account.
Comments: Revised version, 47 pages in SciPost format, with 13 captioned figures
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph); Nuclear Theory (nucl-th)
Report number: doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.11.2.020
Cite as: arXiv:2010.13709 [hep-ph]
  (or arXiv:2010.13709v2 [hep-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.13709
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: SciPost Phys. 11, 020 (2021)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.11.2.020
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Felipe J. Llanes-Estrada [view email]
[v1] Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:52:33 UTC (838 KB)
[v2] Fri, 4 Jun 2021 08:32:34 UTC (1,260 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Systematizing and addressing theory uncertainties of unitarization with the Inverse Amplitude Method, by Alexandre Salas-Bern\'ardez and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
hep-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-10
Change to browse by:
nucl-th

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack