Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2010.12617

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Medical Physics

arXiv:2010.12617 (physics)
[Submitted on 23 Oct 2020]

Title:Automatic dual air kerma strength treatment planning for focal low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy boost using dosimetric and geometric constraints

Authors:S. Sara Mahdavi, Michael D. Peacock, William J. Morris, Ingrid T. Spadinger
View a PDF of the paper titled Automatic dual air kerma strength treatment planning for focal low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy boost using dosimetric and geometric constraints, by S. Sara Mahdavi and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Purpose: Automatic planning for focal low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB) boost.
Methods: A simulated annealing approach was utilized for creating automatic focal LDR-PB boost plans using both geometric (i.e. adherence of isodose contours to structure contours) and dosimetric constraints. In 46 patients, four unilateral focal lesion scenarios were considered as the boost region, in the anterior/posterior and superior/inferior quadrants. Plans consisted of seeds with two air kerma strengths (0.740U and 0.351 or 0.354U) to achieve required dose coverage on these smaller focal targets. Plan characteristics (including PTV V100 and V150, Rectum V50, Urethra V150, and number of needles and seeds), were compared in terms of type of needle loading (dual vs. single air kerma needles), boost quadrant and prostate volume. Plans were blindly ranked on 20 consecutive cases by two experienced radiation oncologists.
Results: Differences in plans generated using the two needle loading techniques were not clinically significant, particularly in terms of the PTV V100 and V150 and Urethra V150, with single air kerma loaded needles potentially being more practical. A higher rectal dose was observed in the posterior boost quadrants (V50 >0.18), particularly in larger prostates (>40 cc). In smaller prostates (<25 cc), obtaining adequate dose coverage while sparing the urethra was more challenging. 88% of the plans were considered clinically acceptable without (46%) or with (mostly minor) modifications.
Conclusions: The novel approach of using dual air kerma seeds combined with geometric constraints within a simulated annealing-based automatic planning framework can lead to focal LDR-PB plans with high acceptability.
Comments: 16 pages, 3 figures, 5 tables
Subjects: Medical Physics (physics.med-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2010.12617 [physics.med-ph]
  (or arXiv:2010.12617v1 [physics.med-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.12617
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Sara Mahdavi [view email]
[v1] Fri, 23 Oct 2020 19:05:02 UTC (945 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Automatic dual air kerma strength treatment planning for focal low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy boost using dosimetric and geometric constraints, by S. Sara Mahdavi and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.med-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-10
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack