Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2010.08183

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Social and Information Networks

arXiv:2010.08183 (cs)
[Submitted on 16 Oct 2020 (v1), last revised 10 Nov 2020 (this version, v4)]

Title:Analysis of Twitter and YouTube during USelections 2020

Authors:Alexander Shevtsov, Maria Oikonomidou, Despoina Antonakaki, Polyvios Pratikakis, Sotiris Ioannidis
View a PDF of the paper titled Analysis of Twitter and YouTube during USelections 2020, by Alexander Shevtsov and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:The presidential elections in the United States on 3 November 2020 have caused extensive discussions on social media. A part of the content on US elections is organic, coming from users discussing their opinions of the candidates, political positions, or relevant content presented on television. Another significant part of the content generated originates from organized campaigns, both official and by astroturfing.
In this study, we obtain approximately 17.5M tweets containing 3M users, based on prevalent hashtags related to US election 2020, as well as the related YouTube links, contained in the Twitter dataset, likes, dislikes and comments of the videos and conduct volume, sentiment and graph analysis on the communities formed.
Particularly, we study the daily traffic per prevalent hashtags, plot the retweet graph from July to September 2020, show how its main connected component becomes denser in the period closer to the elections and highlight the two main entities ('Biden' and 'Trump'). Additionally, we gather the related YouTube links contained in the previous dataset and perform sentiment analysis. The results on sentiment analysis on the Twitter corpus and the YouTube metadata gathered, show the positive and negative sentiment for the two entities throughout this period. The results of sentiment analysis indicate that 45.7% express positive sentiment towards Trump in Twitter and 33.8% positive sentiment towards Biden, while 14.55% of users express positive sentiment in YouTube metadata gathered towards Trump and 8.7% positive sentiment towards Biden. Our analysis fill the gap between the connection of offline events and their consequences in social media by monitoring important events in real world and measuring public volume and sentiment before and after the event in social media.
Subjects: Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)
Cite as: arXiv:2010.08183 [cs.SI]
  (or arXiv:2010.08183v4 [cs.SI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.08183
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270542
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Despoina Antonakaki [view email]
[v1] Fri, 16 Oct 2020 06:10:35 UTC (10,015 KB)
[v2] Wed, 21 Oct 2020 08:37:09 UTC (11,473 KB)
[v3] Tue, 3 Nov 2020 13:23:27 UTC (16,653 KB)
[v4] Tue, 10 Nov 2020 13:35:37 UTC (16,676 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Analysis of Twitter and YouTube during USelections 2020, by Alexander Shevtsov and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.SI
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-10
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Despoina Antonakaki
Polyvios Pratikakis
Sotiris Ioannidis
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack