Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2010.05025

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Information Retrieval

arXiv:2010.05025 (cs)
[Submitted on 10 Oct 2020 (v1), last revised 26 May 2022 (this version, v2)]

Title:Historical Credibility for Movie Reviews and Its Application to Weakly Supervised Classification

Authors:Min-Seon Kim, Bo-Young Lim, Han-Sub Shin, Hyuk-Yoon Kwon
View a PDF of the paper titled Historical Credibility for Movie Reviews and Its Application to Weakly Supervised Classification, by Min-Seon Kim and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:In this study, we deal with the problem of judging the credibility of movie reviews. The problem is challenging because even experts cannot clearly and efficiently judge the credibility of a movie review and the number of movie reviews is very large. To tackle this problem, we propose historical credibility that judges the credibility of reviews based on the historical ratings and textual reviews written by each reviewer. For this, we present three kinds of criteria that can clearly classify the reviews into trusted or distrusted ones. We validate the effectiveness of the proposed historical credibility through extensive analysis. Specifically, we show that characteristics between the trusted or distrusted reviews are quite distinguishable in terms of three viewpoints: 1) distribution, 2) statistics, and 3) correlation. Then, we apply historical credibility to a weakly supervised model to classify a given review as a trusted or distrusted one. First, we show that it is significantly efficient because the entire data set is annotated according to the predefined criteria. Indeed, it can annotate 6,400 movie reviews only in 0.093 seconds, which occupy only 0.55%~1.88% of the total learning time when we use LSTM and SVM as the learning model. Second, we show that the historical credibility-based classification model clearly outperforms the textual review-based classification model. Specifically, the classification accuracy of the former outperforms that of the latter by up to 11.7%~13.4%. In addition, we clearly confirm that our classification model shows higher accuracy as the data size increases.
Subjects: Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
Cite as: arXiv:2010.05025 [cs.IR]
  (or arXiv:2010.05025v2 [cs.IR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.05025
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Hyuk-Yoon Kwon [view email]
[v1] Sat, 10 Oct 2020 15:16:55 UTC (2,074 KB)
[v2] Thu, 26 May 2022 12:34:13 UTC (6,841 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Historical Credibility for Movie Reviews and Its Application to Weakly Supervised Classification, by Min-Seon Kim and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.IR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-10
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Hyuk-Yoon Kwon
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack