Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2009.11491

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

arXiv:2009.11491 (cs)
[Submitted on 24 Sep 2020]

Title:Understanding Fairness of Gender Classification Algorithms Across Gender-Race Groups

Authors:Anoop Krishnan, Ali Almadan, Ajita Rattani
View a PDF of the paper titled Understanding Fairness of Gender Classification Algorithms Across Gender-Race Groups, by Anoop Krishnan and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Automated gender classification has important applications in many domains, such as demographic research, law enforcement, online advertising, as well as human-computer interaction. Recent research has questioned the fairness of this technology across gender and race. Specifically, the majority of the studies raised the concern of higher error rates of the face-based gender classification system for darker-skinned people like African-American and for women. However, to date, the majority of existing studies were limited to African-American and Caucasian only. The aim of this paper is to investigate the differential performance of the gender classification algorithms across gender-race groups. To this aim, we investigate the impact of (a) architectural differences in the deep learning algorithms and (b) training set imbalance, as a potential source of bias causing differential performance across gender and race. Experimental investigations are conducted on two latest large-scale publicly available facial attribute datasets, namely, UTKFace and FairFace. The experimental results suggested that the algorithms with architectural differences varied in performance with consistency towards specific gender-race groups. For instance, for all the algorithms used, Black females (Black race in general) always obtained the least accuracy rates. Middle Eastern males and Latino females obtained higher accuracy rates most of the time. Training set imbalance further widens the gap in the unequal accuracy rates across all gender-race groups. Further investigations using facial landmarks suggested that facial morphological differences due to the bone structure influenced by genetic and environmental factors could be the cause of the least performance of Black females and Black race, in general.
Comments: 19th IEEE International Conference On Machine Learning And Applications 2020 | Miami, Florida
Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2009.11491 [cs.CV]
  (or arXiv:2009.11491v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.11491
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Anoop Krishnan Upendran Nair [view email]
[v1] Thu, 24 Sep 2020 04:56:10 UTC (47,720 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Understanding Fairness of Gender Classification Algorithms Across Gender-Race Groups, by Anoop Krishnan and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CV
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-09
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.LG

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Ajita Rattani
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack