Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:2008.04295v1

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Applications

arXiv:2008.04295v1 (stat)
[Submitted on 10 Aug 2020 (this version), latest version 14 Aug 2020 (v3)]

Title:Segmentation analysis and the recovery of queuing parameters via the Wasserstein distance: a study of administrative data for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Authors:Henry Wilde, Vincent Knight, Jonathan Gillard, Kendal Smith
View a PDF of the paper titled Segmentation analysis and the recovery of queuing parameters via the Wasserstein distance: a study of administrative data for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, by Henry Wilde and Vincent Knight and Jonathan Gillard and Kendal Smith
View PDF
Abstract:This work uses a data-driven approach to analyse how the resource requirements of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may change, and quantifies how those changes affect the strains of the hospital system the patients interact with. This is done using a novel combination of often distinct modes of analysis: segmentation, operational queuing theory, and the recovery of parameters from incomplete data. By combining these methods as presented here, it is demonstrated how the potential limitations around the availability of fine-grained data can be overcome in operational research. That is, despite using only administrative data, useful operational results are found. The paper begins by finding an effective clustering of the population from this granular data that feeds into a multi-class M/M/c model, whose parameters are recovered from the data via parameterisation and the Wasserstein distance. This model is then used to conduct an informative analysis of the underlying queuing system and the needs of the population under study through several `what-if' scenarios. The particular analyses used to form and study this model considers, in effect, all types of patient arrivals and how those types impact the system. With that, this study finds that there are no quick solutions to reduce the impact of COPD patients on the system, including adding capacity to the system. In fact, the only effective intervention to reduce the strains of the COPD population is to enact some external policy that directly improves the overall health of the COPD population before arriving at the hospital.
Comments: 24 pages, 11 figures (19 including subfigures)
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:2008.04295 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:2008.04295v1 [stat.AP] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2008.04295
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Henry Wilde [view email]
[v1] Mon, 10 Aug 2020 17:47:34 UTC (139 KB)
[v2] Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:15:00 UTC (299 KB)
[v3] Fri, 14 Aug 2020 11:43:00 UTC (157 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Segmentation analysis and the recovery of queuing parameters via the Wasserstein distance: a study of administrative data for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, by Henry Wilde and Vincent Knight and Jonathan Gillard and Kendal Smith
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
stat.AP
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-08
Change to browse by:
stat
stat.ML

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack