Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2008.02100

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Networking and Internet Architecture

arXiv:2008.02100 (cs)
[Submitted on 4 Aug 2020 (v1), last revised 16 May 2021 (this version, v2)]

Title:Underlay Radar-Massive MIMO Spectrum Sharing: Modeling Fundamentals and Performance Analysis

Authors:Raghunandan M. Rao, Harpreet S. Dhillon, Vuk Marojevic, Jeffrey H. Reed
View a PDF of the paper titled Underlay Radar-Massive MIMO Spectrum Sharing: Modeling Fundamentals and Performance Analysis, by Raghunandan M. Rao and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:In this work, we study underlay radar-massive MIMO cellular coexistence in LoS/near-LoS channels, where both systems have 3D beamforming capabilities. Using mathematical tools from stochastic geometry, we derive an upper bound on the average interference power at the radar due to the 3D massive MIMO cellular downlink under the worst-case `cell-edge beamforming' conditions. To overcome the technical challenges imposed by asymmetric and arbitrarily large cells, we devise a novel construction in which each Poisson Voronoi (PV) cell is bounded by its circumcircle to bound the effect of the random cell shapes on average interference. Since this model is intractable for further analysis due to the correlation between adjacent PV cells' shapes and sizes, we propose a tractable nominal interference model, where we model each PV cell as a circular disk with an area equal to the average area of the typical cell. We quantify the gap in the average interference power between these two models and show that the upper bound is tight for realistic deployment parameters. We also compare them with a more practical but intractable MU-MIMO scheduling model to show that our worst-case interference models show the same trends and do not deviate significantly from realistic scheduler models. Under the nominal interference model, we characterize the interference distribution using the dominant interferer approximation by deriving the equi-interference contour expression when the typical receiver uses 3D beamforming. Finally, we use tractable expressions for the interference distribution to characterize radar's spatial probability of false alarm/detection in a quasi-static target tracking scenario. Our results reveal useful trends in the average interference as a function of the deployment parameters (BS density, exclusion zone radius, antenna height, transmit power of each BS, etc.).
Comments: This arXiv manuscript subsumes the contents of the conference paper presented at the 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (Globecom), Waikoloa, HI. The conference version is available at arXiv:1907.09536
Subjects: Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI); Signal Processing (eess.SP)
Cite as: arXiv:2008.02100 [cs.NI]
  (or arXiv:2008.02100v2 [cs.NI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2008.02100
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2021.3081458
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Raghunandan M Rao [view email]
[v1] Tue, 4 Aug 2020 02:37:10 UTC (2,522 KB)
[v2] Sun, 16 May 2021 19:54:02 UTC (7,728 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Underlay Radar-Massive MIMO Spectrum Sharing: Modeling Fundamentals and Performance Analysis, by Raghunandan M. Rao and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.NI
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-08
Change to browse by:
cs
eess
eess.SP

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Raghunandan M. Rao
Harpreet S. Dhillon
Vuk Marojevic
Jeffrey H. Reed
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack