Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2007.16192

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Data Structures and Algorithms

arXiv:2007.16192 (cs)
[Submitted on 31 Jul 2020 (v1), last revised 21 Jun 2021 (this version, v4)]

Title:Contiguous Graph Partitioning For Optimal Total Or Bottleneck Communication

Authors:Willow Ahrens
View a PDF of the paper titled Contiguous Graph Partitioning For Optimal Total Or Bottleneck Communication, by Willow Ahrens
View PDF
Abstract: Graph partitioning schedules parallel calculations like sparse matrix-vector multiply (SpMV). We consider contiguous partitions, where the $m$ rows (or columns) of a sparse matrix with $N$ nonzeros are split into $K$ parts without reordering. We propose the first near-linear time algorithms for several graph partitioning problems in the contiguous regime.
Traditional objectives such as the simple edge cut, hyperedge cut, or hypergraph connectivity minimize the total cost of all parts under a balance constraint. Our total partitioners use $O(Km + N)$ space. They run in $O((Km\log(m) + N)\log(N))$ time, a significant improvement over prior $O(K(m^2 + N))$ time algorithms due to Kernighan and Grandjean et. al.
Bottleneck partitioning minimizes the maximum cost of any part. We propose a new bottleneck cost which reflects the sum of communication and computation on each part. Our bottleneck partitioners use linear space. The exact algorithm runs in linear time when $K^2$ is $O(N^C)$ for $C < 1$. Our $(1 + \epsilon)$-approximate algorithm runs in linear time when $K\log(c_{high}/(c_{low}\epsilon))$ is $O(N^C)$ for $C < 1$, where $c_{high}$ and $c_{low}$ are upper and lower bounds on the optimal cost. We also propose a simpler $(1 + \epsilon)$-approximate algorithm which runs in a factor of $\log(c_{high}/(c_{low}\epsilon))$ from linear time.
We empirically demonstrate that our algorithms efficiently produce high-quality contiguous partitions on a test suite of 42 test matrices. When $K = 8$, our hypergraph connectivity partitioner achieved a speedup of $53\times$ (mean $15.1\times$) over prior algorithms. The mean runtime of our bottleneck partitioner was 5.15 SpMVs.
Comments: 20 pages; added total partitioning algorithm, added total costs, added experimental results, added lazy near-linear bisection algorithm, simplified presentation. This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication
Subjects: Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
Cite as: arXiv:2007.16192 [cs.DS]
  (or arXiv:2007.16192v4 [cs.DS] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.16192
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Willow Ahrens [view email]
[v1] Fri, 31 Jul 2020 17:41:31 UTC (35 KB)
[v2] Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:46:28 UTC (1,160 KB)
[v3] Sun, 29 Nov 2020 00:11:21 UTC (972 KB)
[v4] Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:02:26 UTC (2,903 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Contiguous Graph Partitioning For Optimal Total Or Bottleneck Communication, by Willow Ahrens
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.DS
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-07
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Peter Ahrens
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack