Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > math > arXiv:2007.15869

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Mathematics > Optimization and Control

arXiv:2007.15869 (math)
[Submitted on 31 Jul 2020]

Title:Behavioral Economics for Human-in-the-loop Control Systems Design: Overconfidence and the hot hand fallacy

Authors:Marius Protte, Rene Fahr, Daniel E. Quevedo
View a PDF of the paper titled Behavioral Economics for Human-in-the-loop Control Systems Design: Overconfidence and the hot hand fallacy, by Marius Protte and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Successful design of human-in-the-loop control systems requires appropriate models for human decision makers. Whilst most paradigms adopted in the control systems literature hide the (limited) decision capability of humans, in behavioral economics individual decision making and optimization processes are well-known to be affected by perceptual and behavioral biases. Our goal is to enrich control engineering with some insights from behavioral economics research through exposing such biases in control-relevant settings. This paper addresses the following two key questions: 1) How do behavioral biases affect decision making? 2) What is the role played by feedback in human-in-the-loop control systems? Our experimental framework shows how individuals behave when faced with the task of piloting an UAV under risk and uncertainty, paralleling a real-world decision-making scenario. Our findings support the notion of humans in Cyberphysical Systems underlying behavioral biases regardless of -- or even because of -- receiving immediate outcome feedback. We observe substantial shares of drone controllers to act inefficiently through either flying excessively (overconfident) or overly conservatively (underconfident). Furthermore, we observe human-controllers to self-servingly misinterpret random sequences through being subject to a "hot hand fallacy". We advise control engineers to mind the human component in order not to compromise technological accomplishments through human issues.
Comments: 17 pages, to be published in "IEEE Control Systems" December 2020 issue
Subjects: Optimization and Control (math.OC); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
Cite as: arXiv:2007.15869 [math.OC]
  (or arXiv:2007.15869v1 [math.OC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.15869
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Daniel Quevedo E [view email]
[v1] Fri, 31 Jul 2020 06:55:00 UTC (953 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Behavioral Economics for Human-in-the-loop Control Systems Design: Overconfidence and the hot hand fallacy, by Marius Protte and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
math.OC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-07
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SY
eess
eess.SY
math

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack