Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > hep-th > arXiv:2007.15706

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

High Energy Physics - Theory

arXiv:2007.15706 (hep-th)
[Submitted on 30 Jul 2020 (v1), last revised 17 Jun 2021 (this version, v2)]

Title:Machine learning for complete intersection Calabi-Yau manifolds: a methodological study

Authors:Harold Erbin, Riccardo Finotello
View a PDF of the paper titled Machine learning for complete intersection Calabi-Yau manifolds: a methodological study, by Harold Erbin and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We revisit the question of predicting both Hodge numbers $h^{1,1}$ and $h^{2,1}$ of complete intersection Calabi-Yau (CICY) 3-folds using machine learning (ML), considering both the old and new datasets built respectively by Candelas-Dale-Lutken-Schimmrigk / Green-Hübsch-Lutken and by Anderson-Gao-Gray-Lee. In real world applications, implementing a ML system rarely reduces to feed the brute data to the algorithm. Instead, the typical workflow starts with an exploratory data analysis (EDA) which aims at understanding better the input data and finding an optimal representation. It is followed by the design of a validation procedure and a baseline model. Finally, several ML models are compared and combined, often involving neural networks with a topology more complicated than the sequential models typically used in physics. By following this procedure, we improve the accuracy of ML computations for Hodge numbers with respect to the existing literature. First, we obtain 97% (resp. 99%) accuracy for $h^{1,1}$ using a neural network inspired by the Inception model for the old dataset, using only 30% (resp. 70%) of the data for training. For the new one, a simple linear regression leads to almost 100% accuracy with 30% of the data for training. The computation of $h^{2,1}$ is less successful as we manage to reach only 50% accuracy for both datasets, but this is still better than the 16% obtained with a simple neural network (SVM with Gaussian kernel and feature engineering and sequential convolutional network reach at best 36%). This serves as a proof of concept that neural networks can be valuable to study the properties of geometries appearing in string theory.
Comments: 59 pages; additional details, references updated
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Algebraic Geometry (math.AG)
Cite as: arXiv:2007.15706 [hep-th]
  (or arXiv:2007.15706v2 [hep-th] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.15706
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Phys. Rev. D 103, 126014 (2021)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.126014
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Riccardo Finotello [view email]
[v1] Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:43:49 UTC (1,460 KB)
[v2] Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:51:04 UTC (1,460 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Machine learning for complete intersection Calabi-Yau manifolds: a methodological study, by Harold Erbin and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
hep-th
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-07
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
math
math.AG

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack