Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2007.15702

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

arXiv:2007.15702 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 30 Jul 2020 (v1), last revised 26 Oct 2020 (this version, v2)]

Title:X-ray evolution of the nova V959 Mon suggests a delayed ejection and a non-radiative shock

Authors:Thomas Nelson, Koji Mukai, Laura Chomiuk, Jennifer L. Sokoloski, Justin D. Linford, Thomas Finzell, Amy J. Mioduszewski, Michael P. Rupen, Jennifer Weston, Raimundo Lopes de Oliveira
View a PDF of the paper titled X-ray evolution of the nova V959 Mon suggests a delayed ejection and a non-radiative shock, by Thomas Nelson and 8 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:X-ray observations of shocked gas in novae can provide a useful probe of the dynamics of the ejecta. Here we report on X-ray observations of the nova V959 Mon, which was also detected in GeV gamma-rays with the Fermi satellite. We find that the X-ray spectra are consistent with a two-temperature plasma model with non-solar abundances. We interpret the X-rays as due to shock interaction between the slow equatorial torus and the fast polar outflow that were inferred from radio observations of V959 Mon. We further propose that the hotter component, responsible for most of the flux, is from the reverse shock driven into the fast outflow. We find a systematic drop in the column density of the absorber between Days 60 and 140, consistent with the expectations for such a picture. We present intriguing evidence for a delay of around 40 days in the expulsion of the ejecta from the central binary. Moreover, we infer a relatively small (a few times 10$^{-6}$ Msun) ejecta mass ahead of the shock, considerably lower than the mass of 10$^4$ K gas inferred from radio observations. Finally, we infer that the dominant X-ray shock was likely not radiative at the time of our observations, and that the shock power was considerably higher than the observed X-ray luminosity. It is unclear why high X-ray luminosity, closer to the inferred shock power, is never seen in novae at early times, when the shock is expected to have high enough density to be radiative.
Comments: 15 pages, 7 figures; accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Subjects: High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE)
Cite as: arXiv:2007.15702 [astro-ph.HE]
  (or arXiv:2007.15702v2 [astro-ph.HE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.15702
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3367
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Koji Mukai [view email]
[v1] Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:31:05 UTC (277 KB)
[v2] Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:01:46 UTC (280 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled X-ray evolution of the nova V959 Mon suggests a delayed ejection and a non-radiative shock, by Thomas Nelson and 8 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.HE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-07
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack