Statistics > Machine Learning
[Submitted on 25 Jul 2020 (v1), last revised 12 Jan 2024 (this version, v5)]
Title:A finite sample analysis of the benign overfitting phenomenon for ridge function estimation
View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Recent extensive numerical experiments in high scale machine learning have allowed to uncover a quite counterintuitive phase transition, as a function of the ratio between the sample size and the number of parameters in the model. As the number of parameters $p$ approaches the sample size $n$, the generalisation error increases, but surprisingly, it starts decreasing again past the threshold $p=n$. This phenomenon, brought to the theoretical community attention in \cite{belkin2019reconciling}, has been thoroughly investigated lately, more specifically for simpler models than deep neural networks, such as the linear model when the parameter is taken to be the minimum norm solution to the least-squares problem, firstly in the asymptotic regime when $p$ and $n$ tend to infinity, see e.g. \cite{hastie2019surprises}, and recently in the finite dimensional regime and more specifically for linear models \cite{bartlett2020benign}, \cite{tsigler2020benign}, \cite{lecue2022geometrical}. In the present paper, we propose a finite sample analysis of non-linear models of \textit{ridge} type, where we investigate the \textit{overparametrised regime} of the double descent phenomenon for both the \textit{estimation problem} and the \textit{prediction} problem. Our results provide a precise analysis of the distance of the best estimator from the true parameter as well as a generalisation bound which complements recent works of \cite{bartlett2020benign} and \cite{chinot2020benign}. Our analysis is based on tools closely related to the continuous Newton method \cite{neuberger2007continuous} and a refined quantitative analysis of the performance in prediction of the minimum $\ell_2$-norm solution.
Submission history
From: Stephane Chretien [view email][v1] Sat, 25 Jul 2020 08:40:29 UTC (84 KB)
[v2] Sun, 11 Oct 2020 12:21:23 UTC (86 KB)
[v3] Thu, 28 Jan 2021 19:41:10 UTC (17 KB)
[v4] Fri, 17 Nov 2023 14:44:26 UTC (18 KB)
[v5] Fri, 12 Jan 2024 18:04:59 UTC (18 KB)
Current browse context:
stat.ML
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.