Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2007.01141

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Physics Education

arXiv:2007.01141 (physics)
[Submitted on 26 Jun 2020]

Title:Teaching assistants' performance at identifying common introductory student difficulties revealed by the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism

Authors:Nafis I Karim, Alexandru Maries, Chandralekha Singh
View a PDF of the paper titled Teaching assistants' performance at identifying common introductory student difficulties revealed by the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism, by Nafis I Karim and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We discuss research involving the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism (CSEM) to evaluate one aspect of the pedagogical content knowledge of teaching assistants (TAs): the knowledge of introductory students' alternate conceptions in electricity and magnetism as revealed by the CSEM. For each item on the CSEM, the TAs were asked to (1) identify the most common incorrect answer choice of introductory physics students and (2) predict the percentage of introductory students who would answer the question correctly in a post-test. Then, we used the CSEM post-test data from approximately 400 introductory physics students (provided in the original paper describing the CSEM) to assess the extent to which the TAs were able to identify the alternate conceptions of introductory students related to electricity and magnetism. In addition, we conducted think-aloud interviews with TAs who had at least two semester of teaching experience in recitations to explore their reasoning about this task. We find that the TAs struggled to think about the difficulty of the questions from introductory students' perspective and they often underestimated the difficulty of the questions. Moreover, the TAs often expected certain incorrect answer choices to be common among introductory students when in fact those answer choices were not common.
Comments: 4 pages, 3 figures. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2006.15058
Subjects: Physics Education (physics.ed-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2007.01141 [physics.ed-ph]
  (or arXiv:2007.01141v1 [physics.ed-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.01141
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: 2017 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, 208-2011 (2018)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2017.pr.047
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Alexandru Maries [view email]
[v1] Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:48:14 UTC (2,046 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Teaching assistants' performance at identifying common introductory student difficulties revealed by the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism, by Nafis I Karim and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.ed-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-07
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack