Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2006.15053

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Physics Education

arXiv:2006.15053 (physics)
[Submitted on 26 Jun 2020]

Title:Case of two electrostatics problems: Can providing a diagram adversely impact introductory physics students' problem solving performance?

Authors:Alexandru Maries, Chandralekha Singh
View a PDF of the paper titled Case of two electrostatics problems: Can providing a diagram adversely impact introductory physics students' problem solving performance?, by Alexandru Maries and Chandralekha Singh
View PDF
Abstract:Drawing appropriate diagrams is a useful problem solving heuristic that can transform a problem into a representation that is easier to exploit for solving it. One major focus while helping introductory physics students learn effective problem solving is to help them understand that drawing diagrams can facilitate problem solution. We conducted an investigation in which two different interventions were implemented during recitation quizzes in a large enrollment algebra-based introductory physics course. Students were either (i) asked to solve problems in which the diagrams were drawn for them or (ii) explicitly told to draw a diagram. A comparison group was not given any instruction regarding diagrams. We developed rubrics to score the problem solving performance of students in different intervention groups and investigated ten problems. We found that students who were provided diagrams never performed better and actually performed worse than the other students on three problems, one involving standing sound waves in a tube (discussed elsewhere) and two problems in electricity which we focus on here. These two problems were the only problems in electricity that involved considerations of initial and final conditions, which may partly account for why students provided with diagrams performed significantly worse than students who were not provided with diagrams. In order to explore potential reasons for this finding, we conducted interviews with students and found that some students provided with diagrams may have spent less time on the conceptual analysis and planning stage of the problem solving process. In particular, those provided with the diagram were more likely to jump into the implementation stage of problem solving early without fully analyzing and understanding the problem, which can increase the likelihood of mistakes in solutions.
Subjects: Physics Education (physics.ed-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2006.15053 [physics.ed-ph]
  (or arXiv:2006.15053v1 [physics.ed-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.15053
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Physical Review PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH 14, 010114 (2018)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010114
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Alexandru Maries [view email]
[v1] Fri, 26 Jun 2020 15:31:44 UTC (1,364 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Case of two electrostatics problems: Can providing a diagram adversely impact introductory physics students' problem solving performance?, by Alexandru Maries and Chandralekha Singh
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.ed-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-06
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack