close this message
arXiv smileybones

Happy Birthday to arXiv!

It's our birthday — woohoo! On August 14th, 1991, the very first paper was submitted to arXiv. That's 34 years of open science! Give today and help support arXiv for many birthdays to come.

Give a gift!
Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2005.01594

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

arXiv:2005.01594 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 4 May 2020 (v1), last revised 23 Oct 2020 (this version, v2)]

Title:Bayesian estimate of the superfluid moments of inertia from the 2016 glitch in the Vela pulsar

Authors:Alessandro Montoli, Marco Antonelli, Fabio Magistrelli, Pierre Pizzochero
View a PDF of the paper titled Bayesian estimate of the superfluid moments of inertia from the 2016 glitch in the Vela pulsar, by Alessandro Montoli and Marco Antonelli and Fabio Magistrelli and Pierre Pizzochero
View PDF
Abstract:The observation of the first pulse-to-pulse glitch in the Vela pulsar opens a new window on the internal dynamics of neutron stars. We study the minimal three-component model for pulsar glitches by solving it with generic initial conditions. The purpose is to use this solution to fit the data of the 2016 Vela glitch by employing a Bayesian approach and to obtain a probability distribution for the physical parameters of the model and for observational parameters, such as the glitch rise time and the relaxation timescale. The fit is achieved through Bayesian inference. Due to the presence of an increase in the timing residuals near the glitch time, an extra magnetospheric component was added to the three-component model to deal with this phenomenon. A physically reasonable, non-informative prior was set on the parameters of the model, so that the posterior distribution could be compared with information obtained from microphysical calculations. By considering a model with a tightened prior on the moment of inertia fractions and by comparing it with the original model by means of Bayesian model selection, we studied the possibility of a crust-limited superfluid reservoir. We obtained the posterior distribution for the moment of inertia fractions of the superfluid components, the coupling parameters, and the initial velocity lags between the components. An analysis of the inferred posterior also confirmed the presence of an overshoot in that glitch and set an upper limit of $\sim 6\,$s on the glitch rise timescale. The comparison between the two models with different priors on the moment of inertia fractions appears to indicate a need for a core participation in the glitch phenomenon, regardless of the uncertain strength of the entrainment coupling.
Comments: 13 pages, 5 figures
Subjects: High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE)
Cite as: arXiv:2005.01594 [astro-ph.HE]
  (or arXiv:2005.01594v2 [astro-ph.HE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.01594
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: A&A 642, A223 (2020)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038340
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Marco Antonelli [view email]
[v1] Mon, 4 May 2020 16:06:32 UTC (1,099 KB)
[v2] Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:08:33 UTC (911 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Bayesian estimate of the superfluid moments of inertia from the 2016 glitch in the Vela pulsar, by Alessandro Montoli and Marco Antonelli and Fabio Magistrelli and Pierre Pizzochero
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.HE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-05
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack