Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:2004.14823

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Methodology

arXiv:2004.14823 (stat)
[Submitted on 30 Apr 2020]

Title:Multiple imputation using chained random forests: a preliminary study based on the empirical distribution of out-of-bag prediction errors

Authors:Shangzhi Hong, Yuqi Sun, Hanying Li, Henry S. Lynn
View a PDF of the paper titled Multiple imputation using chained random forests: a preliminary study based on the empirical distribution of out-of-bag prediction errors, by Shangzhi Hong and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Missing data are common in data analyses in biomedical fields, and imputation methods based on random forests (RF) have become widely accepted, as the RF algorithm can achieve high accuracy without the need for specification of data distributions or relationships. However, the predictions from RF do not contain information about prediction uncertainty, which was unacceptable for multiple imputation. Available RF-based multiple imputation methods tried to do proper multiple imputation either by sampling directly from observations under predicting nodes without accounting for the prediction error or by making normality assumption about the prediction error distribution. In this study, a novel RF-based multiple imputation method was proposed by constructing conditional distributions the empirical distribution of out-of-bag prediction errors. The proposed method was compared with previous method with parametric assumptions about RF's prediction errors and predictive mean matching based on simulation studies on data with presence of interaction term. The proposed non-parametric method can deliver valid multiple imputation results. The accompanying R package for this study is publicly available.
Comments: Initial version, 6 pages, 1 figure
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:2004.14823 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2004.14823v1 [stat.ME] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.14823
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Shangzhi Hong [view email]
[v1] Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:29:56 UTC (167 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Multiple imputation using chained random forests: a preliminary study based on the empirical distribution of out-of-bag prediction errors, by Shangzhi Hong and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.ME
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-04
Change to browse by:
stat
stat.ML

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack