Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2004.11860

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Data Structures and Algorithms

arXiv:2004.11860 (cs)
[Submitted on 24 Apr 2020 (v1), last revised 22 Dec 2021 (this version, v4)]

Title:Near optimal sparsity-constrained group testing: improved bounds and algorithms

Authors:Oliver Gebhard, Max Hahn-Klimroth, Olaf Parczyk, Manuel Penschuck, Maurice Rolvien, Jonathan Scarlett, Nelvin Tan
View a PDF of the paper titled Near optimal sparsity-constrained group testing: improved bounds and algorithms, by Oliver Gebhard and 6 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Recent advances in noiseless non-adaptive group testing have led to a precise asymptotic characterization of the number of tests required for high-probability recovery in the sublinear regime $k = n^{\theta}$ (with $\theta \in (0,1)$), with $n$ individuals among which $k$ are infected. However, the required number of tests may increase substantially under real-world practical constraints, notably including bounds on the maximum number $\Delta$ of tests an individual can be placed in, or the maximum number $\Gamma$ of individuals in a given test. While previous works have given recovery guarantees for these settings, significant gaps remain between the achievability and converse bounds. In this paper, we substantially or completely close several of the most prominent gaps. In the case of $\Delta$-divisible items, we show that the definite defectives (DD) algorithm coupled with a random regular design is asymptotically optimal in dense scaling regimes, and optimal to within a factor of $\eul$ more generally; we establish this by strengthening both the best known achievability and converse bounds. In the case of $\Gamma$-sized tests, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the regime $\Gamma = \Theta(1)$, and again establish a precise threshold proving the asymptotic optimality of SCOMP (a slight refinement of DD) equipped with a tailored pooling scheme. Finally, for each of these two settings, we provide near-optimal adaptive algorithms based on sequential splitting, and provably demonstrate gaps between the performance of optimal adaptive and non-adaptive algorithms.
Comments: Accepted for publication at IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Subjects: Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Discrete Mathematics (cs.DM); Information Theory (cs.IT); Combinatorics (math.CO)
MSC classes: 05C80, 60B20, 68P30
Cite as: arXiv:2004.11860 [cs.DS]
  (or arXiv:2004.11860v4 [cs.DS] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.11860
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Max Hahn-Klimroth [view email]
[v1] Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:10:23 UTC (467 KB)
[v2] Mon, 9 Nov 2020 10:52:50 UTC (112 KB)
[v3] Sat, 4 Sep 2021 15:00:02 UTC (321 KB)
[v4] Wed, 22 Dec 2021 20:11:15 UTC (432 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Near optimal sparsity-constrained group testing: improved bounds and algorithms, by Oliver Gebhard and 6 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.DS
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.DM
cs.IT
math
math.CO
math.IT

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Oliver Gebhard
Max Hahn-Klimroth
Manuel Penschuck
Maurice Rolvien
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack