Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2004.10518

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2004.10518 (cs)
[Submitted on 22 Apr 2020]

Title:Human and Machine Action Prediction Independent of Object Information

Authors:Fatemeh Ziaeetabar, Jennifer Pomp, Stefan Pfeiffer, Nadiya El-Sourani, Ricarda I. Schubotz, Minija Tamosiunaite, Florentin Wörgötter
View a PDF of the paper titled Human and Machine Action Prediction Independent of Object Information, by Fatemeh Ziaeetabar and 5 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Predicting other people's action is key to successful social interactions, enabling us to adjust our own behavior to the consequence of the others' future actions. Studies on action recognition have focused on the importance of individual visual features of objects involved in an action and its context. Humans, however, recognize actions on unknown objects or even when objects are imagined (pantomime). Other cues must thus compensate the lack of recognizable visual object features. Here, we focus on the role of inter-object relations that change during an action. We designed a virtual reality setup and tested recognition speed for 10 different manipulation actions on 50 subjects. All objects were abstracted by emulated cubes so the actions could not be inferred using object information. Instead, subjects had to rely only on the information that comes from the changes in the spatial relations that occur between those cubes. In spite of these constraints, our results show the subjects were able to predict actions in, on average, less than 64% of the action's duration. We employed a computational model -an enriched Semantic Event Chain (eSEC)- incorporating the information of spatial relations, specifically (a) objects' touching/untouching, (b) static spatial relations between objects and (c) dynamic spatial relations between objects. Trained on the same actions as those observed by subjects, the model successfully predicted actions even better than humans. Information theoretical analysis shows that eSECs optimally use individual cues, whereas humans presumably mostly rely on a mixed-cue strategy, which takes longer until recognition. Providing a better cognitive basis of action recognition may, on one hand improve our understanding of related human pathologies and, on the other hand, also help to build robots for conflict-free human-robot cooperation. Our results open new avenues here.
Comments: This paper includes 31 pages, 11 figures and 1 table
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2004.10518 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2004.10518v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.10518
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Fatemeh Ziaeetabar [view email]
[v1] Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:13:25 UTC (2,201 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Human and Machine Action Prediction Independent of Object Information, by Fatemeh Ziaeetabar and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CV

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Fatemeh Ziaeetabar
Stefan Pfeiffer
Minija Tamosiunaite
Florentin Wörgötter
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack