Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2001.10634

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

arXiv:2001.10634 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 28 Jan 2020]

Title:The Structure of Radiatively Inefficient Black Hole Accretion Flows

Authors:Christopher J. White, Eliot Quataert, Charles F. Gammie
View a PDF of the paper titled The Structure of Radiatively Inefficient Black Hole Accretion Flows, by Christopher J. White and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We run three long-timescale general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of radiatively inefficient accretion flows onto non-rotating black holes. Our aim is to achieve steady-state behavior out to large radii and understand the resulting flow structure. A simulation with adiabatic index Gamma = 4/3 and small initial alternating poloidal magnetic field loops is run to a time of 440,000 GM/c^3, reaching inflow equilibrium inside a radius of 370 GM/c^2. Variations with larger alternating field loops and with Gamma = 5/3 are run to 220,000 GM/c^3, attaining equilibrium out to 170 GM/c^2 and 440 GM/c^2. There is no universal self-similar behavior obtained at radii in inflow equilibrium: the Gamma = 5/3 simulation shows a radial density profile with power law index ranging from -1 in the inner regions to -1/2 in the outer regions, while the others have a power-law slope ranging from -1/2 to close to -2. Both simulations with small field loops reach a state with polar inflow of matter, while the more ordered initial field has polar outflows. However, unbound outflows remove only a factor of order unity of the inflowing material over a factor of ~300 in radius. Our results suggest that the dynamics of radiatively inefficient accretion flows are sensitive to how the flow is fed from larger radii, and may differ appreciably in different astrophysical systems. Millimeter images appropriate for Sgr A* are qualitatively (but not quantitatively) similar in all simulations, with a prominent asymmetric image due to Doppler boosting.
Comments: 22 pages, 21 figures, accepted by ApJ
Subjects: High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE)
Cite as: arXiv:2001.10634 [astro-ph.HE]
  (or arXiv:2001.10634v1 [astro-ph.HE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.10634
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab718e
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Christopher White [view email]
[v1] Tue, 28 Jan 2020 23:21:47 UTC (5,326 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The Structure of Radiatively Inefficient Black Hole Accretion Flows, by Christopher J. White and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.HE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-01
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack