Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2001.08927

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction

arXiv:2001.08927 (cs)
[Submitted on 24 Jan 2020]

Title:The Impact of Content Commenting on User Continuance in Online Q&A Communities: An Affordance Perspective

Authors:Langtao Chen
View a PDF of the paper titled The Impact of Content Commenting on User Continuance in Online Q&A Communities: An Affordance Perspective, by Langtao Chen
View PDF
Abstract:Online question-and-answer (Q&A) communities provide convenient and innovative ways for participants to share information and collaboratively solve problems with others. A growing challenge for those Q&A communities is to encourage and maintain ongoing user participation. From the perspective of motivational affordances, this study proposes a research framework to explain the effect of content commenting on user continuance behavior in online Q&A communities. The moderating role of participant's tenure in the relationship between content commenting and user continuance is also explored. Using a longitudinal panel dataset collected from a large online Q&A community, this research empirically tests the effect of content commenting on continued user participation in the Q&A community. The results show that both comment receipt and comment provisioning are important motivating factors for user continuance in the community. Specifically, received comments on questions submitted by a participant have a positive effect on the participant's continuance of posting questions, while answer comments both received and posted by a participant have positive impact on user continuance of posting answers in the community. In addition, tenure in the community is indeed found to have a significant negative moderating effect on the relationship between content commenting and user continuance. This research not only offers a more nuanced theoretical understanding of how content commenting affects continued user involvement and how participants' tenure in the community moderates the impact of content commenting, but also provides implications for improving user continuance in online Q&A communities.
Comments: 18 pages, 3 figures
Subjects: Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)
MSC classes: 68U35
ACM classes: H.4; J.4
Cite as: arXiv:2001.08927 [cs.HC]
  (or arXiv:2001.08927v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.08927
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Langtao Chen [view email]
[v1] Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:31:49 UTC (671 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The Impact of Content Commenting on User Continuance in Online Q&A Communities: An Affordance Perspective, by Langtao Chen
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.HC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-01
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SI

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack