Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2001.07222

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

arXiv:2001.07222 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 20 Jan 2020]

Title:A new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants

Authors:Emma R. Beasor, Ben Davies, Nathan Smith, Jacco Th. van Loon, Robert D. Gehrz, Donald F. Figer
View a PDF of the paper titled A new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants, by Emma R. Beasor and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Evolutionary models have shown the substantial effect that strong mass-loss rates ($\dot{M}$) can have on the fate of massive stars. Red supergiant (RSG) mass-loss is poorly understood theoretically, and so stellar models rely on purely empirical \mdot-luminosity relations to calculate evolution. Empirical prescriptions usually scale with luminosity and effective temperature, but $\dot{M}$ should also depend on the current mass and hence the surface gravity of the star, yielding more than one possible $\dot{M}$ for the same position on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. One can solve this degeneracy by measuring $\dot{M}$ for RSGs that reside in clusters, where age and initial mass ($M_{\rm init}$) are known. In this paper we derive $\dot{M}$ values and luminosities for RSGs in two clusters, NGC 2004 and RSGC1. Using newly derived $M_{\rm init}$ measurements, we combine the results with those of clusters with a range of ages and derive an $M_{\rm init}$-dependent $\dot{M}$-prescription. When comparing this new prescription to the treatment of mass-loss currently implemented in evolutionary models, we find models drastically over-predict the total mass-loss, by up to a factor of 20. Importantly, the most massive RSGs experience the largest downward revision in their mass-loss rates, drastically changing the impact of wind mass-loss on their evolution. Our results suggest that for most initial masses of RSG progenitors, quiescent mass-loss during the RSG phase is not effective at removing a significant fraction of the H-envelope prior to core-collapse, and we discuss the implications of this for stellar evolution and observations of SNe and SN progenitors.
Comments: 13 pages, accepted to MNRAS
Subjects: Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR); Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)
Cite as: arXiv:2001.07222 [astro-ph.SR]
  (or arXiv:2001.07222v1 [astro-ph.SR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.07222
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa255
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Emma Beasor Dr. [view email]
[v1] Mon, 20 Jan 2020 19:10:37 UTC (2,091 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants, by Emma R. Beasor and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.SR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-01
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.GA

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack