Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:1911.10191

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Methodology

arXiv:1911.10191 (stat)
[Submitted on 22 Nov 2019 (v1), last revised 6 Mar 2021 (this version, v3)]

Title:On the Use of Information Criteria for Subset Selection in Least Squares Regression

Authors:Sen Tian, Clifford M. Hurvich, Jeffrey S. Simonoff
View a PDF of the paper titled On the Use of Information Criteria for Subset Selection in Least Squares Regression, by Sen Tian and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Least squares (LS)-based subset selection methods are popular in linear regression modeling. Best subset selection (BS) is known to be NP-hard and has a computational cost that grows exponentially with the number of predictors. Recently, Bertsimas (2016) formulated BS as a mixed integer optimization (MIO) problem and largely reduced the computation overhead by using a well-developed optimization solver, but the current methodology is not scalable to very large datasets. In this paper, we propose a novel LS-based method, the best orthogonalized subset selection (BOSS) method, which performs BS upon an orthogonalized basis of ordered predictors and scales easily to large problem sizes. Another challenge in applying LS-based methods in practice is the selection rule to choose the optimal subset size k. Cross-validation (CV) requires fitting a procedure multiple times, and results in a selected k that is random across repeated application to the same dataset. Compared to CV, information criteria only require fitting a procedure once, but they require knowledge of the effective degrees of freedom for the fitting procedure, which is generally not available analytically for complex methods. Since BOSS uses orthogonalized predictors, we first explore a connection for orthogonal non-random predictors between BS and its Lagrangian formulation (i.e., minimization of the residual sum of squares plus the product of a regularization parameter and k), and based on this connection propose a heuristic degrees of freedom (hdf) for BOSS that can be estimated via an analytically-based expression. We show in both simulations and real data analysis that BOSS using a proposed Kullback-Leibler based information criterion AICc-hdf has the strongest performance of all of the LS-based methods considered and is competitive with regularization methods, with the computational effort of a single ordinary LS fit.
Comments: Code to reproduce the results in this paper, the complete set of simulation results, and an R package 'BOSSreg' (also available on CRAN), are publicly available at this https URL
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME); Applications (stat.AP)
Cite as: arXiv:1911.10191 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1911.10191v3 [stat.ME] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1911.10191
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Sen Tian [view email]
[v1] Fri, 22 Nov 2019 18:54:43 UTC (98 KB)
[v2] Sun, 22 Dec 2019 05:00:42 UTC (97 KB)
[v3] Sat, 6 Mar 2021 03:46:41 UTC (216 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled On the Use of Information Criteria for Subset Selection in Least Squares Regression, by Sen Tian and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.ME
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-11
Change to browse by:
stat
stat.AP

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack