Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies
[Submitted on 19 Nov 2019 (this version), latest version 20 Feb 2020 (v2)]
Title:Birds of a Feather? Magellan/IMACS Spectroscopy of the Ultra-Faint Satellites Grus II, Tucana IV, and Tucana V
View PDFAbstract:We present Magellan/IMACS spectroscopy of three recently discovered ultra-faint Milky Way satellites, Grus II, Tucana IV, and Tucana V. We measure systemic velocities of V_hel = -110.0 +/- 0.5 km/s, V_hel = 15.9 +/- 1.8 km/s, and V_hel = -36.2 +/-2.5 km/s for the three objects, respectively. Their large relative velocity differences demonstrate that the satellites are unrelated despite their close physical proximity to one another. We determine a velocity dispersion for Tuc IV of sigma = 4.3^+1.7_-1.0 km/s, but are unable to resolve the velocity dispersions of the other two systems. For Gru II we place an upper limit at 90% confidence on the dispersion of sigma < 1.9 km/s, and for Tuc V we are not able to obtain any useful limits. All three satellites have low mean metallicities below [Fe/H] = -2.1, but none has a detectable metallicity spread. Using the spectroscopic member stars, we determine proper motions for each satellite from the second Gaia data release. We compute their orbits around the Milky Way, finding that all three objects are currently approaching pericenter. Gru II is on a tightly bound orbit with a pericentric distance of 25 kpc and apocenter of 66 kpc. Tuc V has a significantly more extended orbit, with an apocenter likely beyond 100 kpc, and could be approaching the Milky Way for the first time. The current orbital parameters of Tuc IV are similar to those of Gru II, with a pericenter of 25 kpc. However, a backward integration of the orbit of Tuc IV demonstrates that it collided with the Large Magellanic Cloud with an impact parameter of 4 kpc ~120 Myr ago, deflecting its trajectory and possibly altering its internal kinematics. Based on their sizes, masses, and metallicities, we classify Gru II and Tuc IV as likely dwarf galaxies, but we are not able to draw strong conclusions about the nature of Tuc V. [slightly abridged]
Submission history
From: Joshua Simon [view email][v1] Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:00:02 UTC (1,492 KB)
[v2] Thu, 20 Feb 2020 22:26:39 UTC (1,522 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.GA
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.