Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1909.10986

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

arXiv:1909.10986 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 24 Sep 2019 (v1), last revised 25 Sep 2019 (this version, v2)]

Title:Regression methods in waveform modeling: a comparative study

Authors:Yoshinta Setyawati, Michael Pürrer, Frank Ohme
View a PDF of the paper titled Regression methods in waveform modeling: a comparative study, by Yoshinta Setyawati and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Gravitational-wave astronomy of compact binaries relies on theoretical models of the gravitational-wave signal that is emitted as binaries coalesce. These models do not only need to be accurate, they also have to be fast to evaluate in order to be able to compare millions of signals in near real time with the data of gravitational-wave instruments. A variety of regression and interpolation techniques have been employed to build efficient waveform models, but no study has systematically compared the performance of these regression methods yet. Here we provide such a comparison of various techniques, including polynomial fits, radial basis functions, Gaussian process regression and artificial neural networks, specifically for the case of gravitational waveform modeling. We use all these techniques to regress analytical models of non-precessing and precessing binary black hole waveforms, and compare the accuracy as well as computational speed. We find that most regression methods are reasonably accurate, but efficiency considerations favour in many cases the most simple approach. We conclude that sophisticated regression methods are not necessarily needed in standard gravitational-wave modeling applications, although problems with higher complexity than what is tested here might be more suitable for machine-learning techniques and more sophisticated methods may have side benefits.
Comments: 31 pages, 5 figures, typos corrected
Subjects: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1909.10986 [astro-ph.IM]
  (or arXiv:1909.10986v2 [astro-ph.IM] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1909.10986
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Class. Quantum Grav. 37 (2020) 075012
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ab693b
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Yoshinta Setyawati [view email]
[v1] Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:10:55 UTC (2,249 KB)
[v2] Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:34:54 UTC (2,249 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Regression methods in waveform modeling: a comparative study, by Yoshinta Setyawati and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.IM
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-09
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
gr-qc
physics
physics.comp-ph

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack