Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > econ > arXiv:1909.02210

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Economics > Econometrics

arXiv:1909.02210 (econ)
[Submitted on 5 Sep 2019 (v1), last revised 22 Jul 2020 (this version, v3)]

Title:Using Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks for the Design of Monte Carlo Simulations

Authors:Susan Athey, Guido Imbens, Jonas Metzger, Evan Munro
View a PDF of the paper titled Using Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks for the Design of Monte Carlo Simulations, by Susan Athey and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:When researchers develop new econometric methods it is common practice to compare the performance of the new methods to those of existing methods in Monte Carlo studies. The credibility of such Monte Carlo studies is often limited because of the freedom the researcher has in choosing the design. In recent years a new class of generative models emerged in the machine learning literature, termed Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) that can be used to systematically generate artificial data that closely mimics real economic datasets, while limiting the degrees of freedom for the researcher and optionally satisfying privacy guarantees with respect to their training data. In addition if an applied researcher is concerned with the performance of a particular statistical method on a specific data set (beyond its theoretical properties in large samples), she may wish to assess the performance, e.g., the coverage rate of confidence intervals or the bias of the estimator, using simulated data which resembles her setting. Tol illustrate these methods we apply Wasserstein GANs (WGANs) to compare a number of different estimators for average treatment effects under unconfoundedness in three distinct settings (corresponding to three real data sets) and present a methodology for assessing the robustness of the results. In this example, we find that (i) there is not one estimator that outperforms the others in all three settings, so researchers should tailor their analytic approach to a given setting, and (ii) systematic simulation studies can be helpful for selecting among competing methods in this situation.
Comments: 30 pages, 4 figures
Subjects: Econometrics (econ.EM); Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:1909.02210 [econ.EM]
  (or arXiv:1909.02210v3 [econ.EM] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1909.02210
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Guido Imbens [view email]
[v1] Thu, 5 Sep 2019 05:01:38 UTC (301 KB)
[v2] Fri, 14 Feb 2020 07:07:15 UTC (194 KB)
[v3] Wed, 22 Jul 2020 03:47:55 UTC (245 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Using Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks for the Design of Monte Carlo Simulations, by Susan Athey and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
econ.EM
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-09
Change to browse by:
econ
stat
stat.ME

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack