Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:1908.04809

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Medical Physics

arXiv:1908.04809 (physics)
[Submitted on 13 Aug 2019]

Title:Generation of abdominal synthetic CTs from 0.35T MR images using generative adversarial networks for MR-only liver radiotherapy

Authors:Jie Fu, Kamal Singhrao, Minsong Cao, Victoria Yu, Anand P. Santhanam, Yingli Yang, Minghao Guo, Ann C. Raldow, Dan Ruan, John H. Lewis
View a PDF of the paper titled Generation of abdominal synthetic CTs from 0.35T MR images using generative adversarial networks for MR-only liver radiotherapy, by Jie Fu and 9 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Electron density maps must be accurately estimated to achieve valid dose calculation in MR-only radiotherapy. The goal of this study is to assess whether two deep learning models, the conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) and the cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (cycleGAN), can generate accurate abdominal synthetic CT (sCT) images from 0.35T MR images for MR-only liver radiotherapy. A retrospective study was performed using CT images and 0.35T MR images of 12 patients with liver (n=8) and non-liver abdominal (n=4) cancer. CT images were deformably registered to the corresponding MR images to generate deformed CT (dCT) images for treatment planning. Both cGAN and cycleGAN were trained using MR and dCT transverse slices. Four-fold cross-validation testing was conducted to generate sCT images for all patients. The HU prediction accuracy was evaluated by voxel-wise similarity metric between each dCT and sCT image for all 12 patients. dCT-based and sCT-based dose distributions were compared using gamma and dose-volume histogram (DVH) metric analysis for 8 liver patients. sCTcycleGAN achieved the average mean absolute error (MAE) of 94.1 HU, while sCTcGAN achieved 89.8 HU. In both models, the average gamma passing rates within all volumes of interest were higher than 95% using a 2%, 2 mm criterion, and 99% using a 3%, 3 mm criterion. The average differences in the mean dose and DVH metrics were within +/-0.6% for the planning target volume and within +/-0.15% for evaluated organs in both models. Results demonstrated that abdominal sCT images generated by both cGAN and cycleGAN achieved accurate dose calculation for 8 liver radiotherapy plans. sCTcGAN images had smaller average MAE and achieved better dose calculation accuracy than sCTcyleGAN images. More abdominal patients will be enrolled in the future to further evaluate two models.
Comments: Review in progress
Subjects: Medical Physics (physics.med-ph); Image and Video Processing (eess.IV)
Cite as: arXiv:1908.04809 [physics.med-ph]
  (or arXiv:1908.04809v1 [physics.med-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1908.04809
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: 2020 Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ab6e1f
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Jie Fu [view email]
[v1] Tue, 13 Aug 2019 18:14:51 UTC (499 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Generation of abdominal synthetic CTs from 0.35T MR images using generative adversarial networks for MR-only liver radiotherapy, by Jie Fu and 9 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.med-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-08
Change to browse by:
eess
eess.IV
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack