Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > eess > arXiv:1907.01409

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Audio and Speech Processing

arXiv:1907.01409 (eess)
[Submitted on 1 Jul 2019]

Title:Comparison of Lattice-Free and Lattice-Based Sequence Discriminative Training Criteria for LVCSR

Authors:Wilfried Michel, Ralf Schlüter, Hermann Ney
View a PDF of the paper titled Comparison of Lattice-Free and Lattice-Based Sequence Discriminative Training Criteria for LVCSR, by Wilfried Michel and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Sequence discriminative training criteria have long been a standard tool in automatic speech recognition for improving the performance of acoustic models over their maximum likelihood / cross entropy trained counterparts. While previously a lattice approximation of the search space has been necessary to reduce computational complexity, recently proposed methods use other approximations to dispense of the need for the computationally expensive step of separate lattice creation.
In this work we present a memory efficient implementation of the forward-backward computation that allows us to use uni-gram word-level language models in the denominator calculation while still doing a full summation on GPU. This allows for a direct comparison of lattice-based and lattice-free sequence discriminative training criteria such as MMI and sMBR, both using the same language model during training.
We compared performance, speed of convergence, and stability on large vocabulary continuous speech recognition tasks like Switchboard and Quaero. We found that silence modeling seriously impacts the performance in the lattice-free case and needs special treatment. In our experiments lattice-free MMI comes on par with its lattice-based counterpart. Lattice-based sMBR still outperforms all lattice-free training criteria.
Comments: Submitted to Interspeech 2019
Subjects: Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Sound (cs.SD); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:1907.01409 [eess.AS]
  (or arXiv:1907.01409v1 [eess.AS] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.01409
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Interspeech 2019, 20th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Graz, Austria, 15-19 September 2019, pp. 1601--1605
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2019-2254
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Wilfried Michel [view email]
[v1] Mon, 1 Jul 2019 15:16:04 UTC (17 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Comparison of Lattice-Free and Lattice-Based Sequence Discriminative Training Criteria for LVCSR, by Wilfried Michel and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
eess.AS
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-07
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CL
cs.LG
cs.SD
eess
stat
stat.ML

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack