Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cond-mat > arXiv:1906.10277

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Condensed Matter > Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics

arXiv:1906.10277 (cond-mat)
[Submitted on 24 Jun 2019 (v1), last revised 27 Jun 2019 (this version, v2)]

Title:Comments on the continuing widespread and unnecessary use of a defective emission equation in field emission related literature

Authors:Richard G. Forbes
View a PDF of the paper titled Comments on the continuing widespread and unnecessary use of a defective emission equation in field emission related literature, by Richard G. Forbes
View PDF
Abstract:Field electron emission (FE) has relevance in many different technological contexts. However, many related technological papers use a physically defective elementary FE equation for local emission current density (LECD). This equation takes the tunneling barrier as exactly triangular, as in the original FE theory of 90 years ago. More than 60 years ago, it was shown that the so-called Schottky-Nordheim (SN) barrier, which includes an image-potential-energy term (that models exchange-and-correlation effects) is better physics. For a metal-like emitter with work-function 4.5 eV, the SN-barrier-related Murphy-Good FE equation predicts LECD values that are higher than the elementary equation values by a large factor, often between around 250 and around 500. By failing to mention/apply this 60-year-old established science, or to inform readers of the large errors associated with the elementary equation, many papers (aided by defective reviewing) spread a new kind of "pathological science", and create a modern research-integrity problem. The present paper aims to enhance author and reviewer awareness by summarizing relevant aspects of FE theory, by explicitly identifying the misjudgment in the original 1928 Fowler-Nordheim paper, by explicitly calculating the size of the resulting error, and by showing in detail why most FE theoreticians regard the 1950s modifications as better physics. Suggestions are made, about nomenclature and about citation practice, that may help to diminish misunderstandings.
Comments: Submitted for publication; in v2 a correction to historical information (with no numerical consequences) has been made in Appendix A
Subjects: Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics (cond-mat.mes-hall); Applied Physics (physics.app-ph); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1906.10277 [cond-mat.mes-hall]
  (or arXiv:1906.10277v2 [cond-mat.mes-hall] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.10277
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5117289
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Richard Forbes [view email]
[v1] Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:38:47 UTC (541 KB)
[v2] Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:49:27 UTC (545 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Comments on the continuing widespread and unnecessary use of a defective emission equation in field emission related literature, by Richard G. Forbes
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cond-mat.mes-hall
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-06
Change to browse by:
cond-mat
physics
physics.app-ph
physics.hist-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack