Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Economics > Theoretical Economics

arXiv:1905.12788 (econ)
[Submitted on 29 May 2019 (v1), last revised 12 Oct 2021 (this version, v2)]

Title:Detectability, Duality, and Surplus Extraction

Authors:Giuseppe Lopomo, Luca Rigotti, Chris Shannon
View PDF
Abstract:We study surplus extraction in the general environment of McAfee and Reny (1992), and provide two alternative proofs of their main theorem. The first is an analogue of the classic argument of Cremer and McLean (1985, 1988), using geometric features of the set of agents' beliefs to construct a menu of contracts extracting the desired surplus. This argument, which requires a finite state space, also leads to a counterexample showing that full extraction is not possible without further significant conditions on agents' beliefs or surplus, even if the designer offers an infinite menu of contracts. The second argument uses duality and applies for an infinite state space, thus yielding the general result of McAfee and Reny (1992). Both arguments suggest methods for studying surplus extraction in settings beyond the standard model, in which the designer or agents might have objectives other than risk neutral expected value maximization.
Subjects: Theoretical Economics (econ.TH)
Cite as: arXiv:1905.12788 [econ.TH]
  (or arXiv:1905.12788v2 [econ.TH] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.12788

Submission history

From: Luca Rigotti [view email]
[v1] Wed, 29 May 2019 23:45:27 UTC (20 KB)
[v2] Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:01:01 UTC (26 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

view license
Current browse context:
econ.TH
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-05
Change to browse by:
econ

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)