close this message
arXiv smileybones

Planned Database Maintenance 2025-09-17 11am-1pm UTC

  • Submission, registration, and all other functions that require login will be temporarily unavailable.
  • Browsing, viewing and searching papers will be unaffected.

Blog post
Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:1905.09551

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability

arXiv:1905.09551 (physics)
[Submitted on 23 May 2019]

Title:Shades of Dark Uncertainty and Consensus Value for the Newtonian Constant of Gravitation

Authors:Christos Merkatas, Blaza Toman, Antonio Possolo, Stephan Schlamminger
View a PDF of the paper titled Shades of Dark Uncertainty and Consensus Value for the Newtonian Constant of Gravitation, by Christos Merkatas and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:The Newtonian constant of gravitation, $G$, stands out in the landscape of the most common fundamental constants owing to its surprisingly large relative uncertainty, which is attributable mostly to the dispersion of the values measured for it in different experiments.
This study focuses on a set of measurements of $G$ that are mutually inconsistent, in the sense that the dispersion of the measured values is significantly larger than what their reported uncertainties suggest that it should be. Furthermore, there is a loosely defined group of measured values that lie fairly close to a consensus value that may be derived from all the measurement results, and then there are one or more groups with measured values farther away from the consensus value, some higher, others lower.
This same general pattern is often observed in many interlaboratory studies and meta-analyses. In the conventional treatments of such data, the mutual inconsistency is addressed by inflating the reported uncertainties, either multiplicatively, or by the addition of random effects, both reflecting the presence of dark uncertainty. The former approach is often used by CODATA and by the Particle Data Group, and the latter is common in medical meta-analysis and in metrology.
We propose a new procedure for consensus building that models the results using latent clusters with different shades of dark uncertainty, which assigns a customized amount of dark uncertainty to each measured value, as a mixture of those shades, and does so taking into account both the placement of the measured values relative to the consensus value, and the reported uncertainties. We demonstrate this procedure by deriving a new estimate for $G$, as a consensus value $G = 6.67408 \times 10^{-11} \,\text{m}^{-3} \, \text{kg}^{-1} \, \text{s}^{-2}$, with $u(G) = 0.00024 \times 10^{-11} \,\text{m}^{-3} \, \text{kg}^{-1} \, \text{s}^{-2}$.
Subjects: Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an); Classical Physics (physics.class-ph); Applications (stat.AP)
Cite as: arXiv:1905.09551 [physics.data-an]
  (or arXiv:1905.09551v1 [physics.data-an] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.09551
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ab3365
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Antonio Possolo [view email]
[v1] Thu, 23 May 2019 09:29:17 UTC (54 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Shades of Dark Uncertainty and Consensus Value for the Newtonian Constant of Gravitation, by Christos Merkatas and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.data-an
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-05
Change to browse by:
physics
physics.class-ph
stat
stat.AP

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack