Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:1905.04361

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Chemical Physics

arXiv:1905.04361 (physics)
[Submitted on 10 May 2019 (v1), last revised 10 Jul 2019 (this version, v2)]

Title:An Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo Perspective on the Ground State of the Dense Uniform Electron Gas: An Investigation with Hartree-Fock Trial Wavefunctions

Authors:Joonho Lee, Fionn D. Malone, Miguel A. Morales
View a PDF of the paper titled An Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo Perspective on the Ground State of the Dense Uniform Electron Gas: An Investigation with Hartree-Fock Trial Wavefunctions, by Joonho Lee and Fionn D. Malone and Miguel A. Morales
View PDF
Abstract:We assess the utility of Hartree-Fock (HF) trial wavefunctions in performing phaseless auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (ph-AFQMC) on the uniform electron gas (UEG) model. The combination of ph-AFQMC with spin-restricted HF (RHF+ph-AFQMC), was found to be highly accurate and efficient for systems containing up to 114 electrons in 2109 orbitals, particularly for $r_s$ $\le$ 2.0. Compared to spin-restricted coupled-cluster (RCC) methods, we found that RHF+ph-AFQMC performs better than CC with singles, doubles, and triples (RCCSDT) and similarly to or slightly worse than CC with singles, doubles, triples, and quadruples (RCCSDTQ) for $r_s$ $\le$ 3.0 in the 14-electron UEG model. With the 54-electron, we found RHF+ph-AFQMC to be nearly exact for $r_s$ $\le$ 2.0 and pointed out potential biases in existing benchmarks. Encouraged by these, we performed RHF+ph-AFQMC on the 114-electron UEG model for $r_s$ $\le$ 2.0 and provided new benchmark data for future method development. We found that the UEG models with $r_s$ = 5.0 remain to be challenging for RHF+ph-AFQMC. Employing non-orthogonal configuration expansions or unrestricted HF states as trial wavefunctions was also found to be ineffective in the case of the 14-electron UEG model with $r_s$ = 5.0. We emphasize the need for a better trial wavefunction for ph-AFQMC in simulating strongly correlated systems. With the 54-electron and 114-electron UEG models, we stress the potential utility of RHF+ph-AFQMC for simulating dense solids.
Subjects: Chemical Physics (physics.chem-ph); Strongly Correlated Electrons (cond-mat.str-el)
Cite as: arXiv:1905.04361 [physics.chem-ph]
  (or arXiv:1905.04361v2 [physics.chem-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.04361
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: J. Chem. Phys. 151, 064122 (2019)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5109572
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Joonho Lee [view email]
[v1] Fri, 10 May 2019 19:54:50 UTC (2,868 KB)
[v2] Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:56:39 UTC (1,905 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled An Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo Perspective on the Ground State of the Dense Uniform Electron Gas: An Investigation with Hartree-Fock Trial Wavefunctions, by Joonho Lee and Fionn D. Malone and Miguel A. Morales
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.chem-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-05
Change to browse by:
cond-mat
cond-mat.str-el
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack