Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Statistics > Applications

arXiv:1905.03325 (stat)
[Submitted on 8 May 2019 (v1), last revised 12 Feb 2021 (this version, v6)]

Title:Fair tournament design: A flaw of the UEFA Euro 2020 qualification

Authors:László Csató
View PDF
Abstract:The integrity of a sport can be seriously undermined if its rules punish winning as this creates incentives for strategic manipulation. Therefore, a sports tournament can be called unfair if the overall win probabilities are not ordered according to the teams' ranking based on their past performances. We present how statistical methods can contribute to choosing a tournament format that is in line with the above axiom. In particular, the qualification for the 2020 UEFA European Championship is shown to violate this requirement: being a top team in the lowest-ranked League D of the 2018/19 UEFA Nations League substantially increases the probability of qualifying compared to being a bottom team in the higher-ranked League C. The unfairness can be remarkably reduced or even eliminated with slightly changing the path formation policy of the UEFA Euro 2020 qualifying play-offs. The misaligned design has severely punished a team for winning a match years before. Since the deficiency is an inherent feature of the qualifying process, the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) should reconsider the format of future tournaments to eliminate the unfair advantage enjoyed by certain teams.
Comments: 21 pages, 8 figures, 2 tables
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP); Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph)
MSC classes: 62F07, 68U20
Cite as: arXiv:1905.03325 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:1905.03325v6 [stat.AP] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.03325

Submission history

From: László Csató [view email]
[v1] Wed, 8 May 2019 20:43:00 UTC (80 KB)
[v2] Mon, 9 Sep 2019 13:22:16 UTC (80 KB)
[v3] Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:00:10 UTC (83 KB)
[v4] Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:53:29 UTC (90 KB)
[v5] Mon, 7 Sep 2020 15:57:38 UTC (90 KB)
[v6] Fri, 12 Feb 2021 12:35:19 UTC (90 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

view license
Current browse context:
stat.AP
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-05
Change to browse by:
physics
physics.soc-ph
stat

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)