Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1904.07889v1

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies

arXiv:1904.07889v1 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 16 Apr 2019 (this version), latest version 26 Sep 2019 (v2)]

Title:Simulating Star Clusters Across Cosmic Time: I. Initial Mass Function, Star Formation Rates and Efficiencies

Authors:Chong-Chong He (1), Massimo Ricotti (1), Sam Geen (2) ((1) Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, US, (2) Universität Heidelberg, Zentrum für Astronomie, Institut für Theoretische Astrophysik, Heidelberg, Germany)
View a PDF of the paper titled Simulating Star Clusters Across Cosmic Time: I. Initial Mass Function, Star Formation Rates and Efficiencies, by Chong-Chong He (1) and 11 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We present a large set of radiation-magneto-hydrodynamic simulations of star formation in self-gravitating, turbulent molecular clouds, modelling the formation of individual massive stars, including their UV radiation feedback. We consider a grid of simulations varying the cloud masses between m_gas = 10^3 M_sun to 3e5 M_sun, and resolving scales between 200 AU to 2000 AU. We consider molecular clouds with gas mean number densities typical of those observed in the local universe and denser molecular clouds expected to exist in high-redshift galaxies.
In this paper, the first of a series, we focus on the analysis of the initial mass function (IMF), the star formation rate (SFR), and the total star formation efficiency (TSFE) in molecular clouds. These are the main results: i) We find that the observed Salpeter power-law slope and normalisation of the stellar IMF at the high-mass end can be reproduced if we assume that each star-forming gas clump (sink particle) fragments into stars producing on average a maximum stellar mass about 40% of the mass of the sink particle, while the remaining 60% is distributed into smaller mass stars. This empirical prescription, and an IMF reproducing a Chabrier IMF, can be obtained assuming that the sinks fragment according to a power-law mass function flatter than Salpeter, with log-slope Gamma sim 0.8. This result is in agreement with the observed mass function of dense cores in some molecular clouds. ii) The star formation law that best describes our set of simulation is drho_*/dt ~ rho_gas^1.5 if n_gas<n_cri ~ 10^3 cm^-3, and drho_*/dt ~ rho_gas^2.5 if n_gas > n_cri. The duration of the star formation episode of roughly 6 sound crossing times of the cloud radius (with c_s=10 km/s). iii) For gas at solar metallicity the TSFE in the cloud is f_*=2% (m_gas/10^4 M_sun)^0.4(1+n_gas/n_cri)^0.91, also in agreement with (ii). [abridged]
Comments: 19 pages, 16 figures, submitted to MNRAS
Subjects: Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)
Cite as: arXiv:1904.07889 [astro-ph.GA]
  (or arXiv:1904.07889v1 [astro-ph.GA] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.07889
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2239
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Chong-Chong He [view email]
[v1] Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:00:20 UTC (5,082 KB)
[v2] Thu, 26 Sep 2019 20:16:27 UTC (5,992 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Simulating Star Clusters Across Cosmic Time: I. Initial Mass Function, Star Formation Rates and Efficiencies, by Chong-Chong He (1) and 11 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.GA
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-04
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack