Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Quantitative Biology > Quantitative Methods

arXiv:1904.07208 (q-bio)
[Submitted on 26 Mar 2019]

Title:More testing or more disease? A counterfactual approach to explaining observed increases in positive tests over time

Authors:Jessica G. Young, Sarah J. Willis, Katherine Hsu, Michael Klompas, Julia L. Marcus
View PDF
Abstract:Observed gonorrhea case rates (number of positive tests per 100,000 individuals) increased by 75 percent in the United States between 2009 and 2017, predominantly among men. However, testing recommendations by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have also changed over this period with more frequent screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) recommended among men who have sex with men (MSM) who are sexually active. In this and similar disease surveillance settings, a common question is whether observed increases in the overall proportion of positive tests over time is due only to increased testing of diseased individuals, increased underlying disease or both. By placing this problem within a counterfactual framework, we can carefully consider untestable assumptions under which this question may be answered and, in turn, a principled approach to statistical analysis. This report outlines this thought process.
Subjects: Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM); Applications (stat.AP)
Cite as: arXiv:1904.07208 [q-bio.QM]
  (or arXiv:1904.07208v1 [q-bio.QM] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.07208

Submission history

From: Jessica Young PhD [view email]
[v1] Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:26:58 UTC (11 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
q-bio.QM
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-04
Change to browse by:
q-bio
stat
stat.AP

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)