Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1903.10646

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:1903.10646 (cs)
[Submitted on 26 Mar 2019 (v1), last revised 13 Jun 2020 (this version, v3)]

Title:Increasing Iterate Averaging for Solving Saddle-Point Problems

Authors:Yuan Gao, Christian Kroer, Donald Goldfarb
View a PDF of the paper titled Increasing Iterate Averaging for Solving Saddle-Point Problems, by Yuan Gao and Christian Kroer and Donald Goldfarb
View PDF
Abstract:Many problems in machine learning and game theory can be formulated as saddle-point problems, for which various first-order methods have been developed and proven efficient in practice. Under the general convex-concave assumption, most first-order methods only guarantee an ergodic convergence rate, that is, the uniform averages of the iterates converge at a $O(1/T)$ rate in terms of the saddle-point residual. However, numerically, the iterates themselves can often converge much faster than the uniform averages. This observation motivates increasing averaging schemes that put more weight on later iterates, in contrast to the usual uniform averaging. We show that such increasing averaging schemes, applied to various first-order methods, are able to preserve the $O(1/T)$ convergence rate with no additional assumptions or computational overhead. Extensive numerical experiments on zero-sum game solving, market equilibrium computation and image denoising demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed schemes. In particular, the increasing averages consistently outperform the uniform averages in all test problems by orders of magnitude. When solving matrix and extensive-form games, increasing averages consistently outperform the last iterates as well. For matrix games, a first-order method equipped with increasing averaging outperforms the highly competitive CFR$^+$ algorithm.
Comments: Preprint. Under Review
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:1903.10646 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:1903.10646v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.10646
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Yuan Gao [view email]
[v1] Tue, 26 Mar 2019 01:00:53 UTC (400 KB)
[v2] Thu, 20 Feb 2020 02:04:31 UTC (6,252 KB)
[v3] Sat, 13 Jun 2020 18:59:52 UTC (7,371 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Increasing Iterate Averaging for Solving Saddle-Point Problems, by Yuan Gao and Christian Kroer and Donald Goldfarb
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.GT
math
math.OC
stat
stat.ML

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Christian Kroer
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack